Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30588279›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2018

Clinicians' Perspectives of a Novel Home-Based Multidisciplinary Telehealth Service for Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain.

Michelle A Cottrell, Anne J Hill, Shaun P O'Leary, Maree E Raymer, Trevor G Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle A CottrellSCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA.
Anne J HillSCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA.
Shaun P O'LearySCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA.
Maree E RaymerSTATE-WIDE NEUROSURGICAL AND ORTHOPAEDIC PHYSIOTHERAPY SCREENING CLINIC & MULTIDISCIPLINARY SERVICE, METRO NORTH HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICE, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA.
Trevor G RussellSCHOOL OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic spinal pain conditions can often be successfully managed by a non-surgical, multidisciplinary approach, however many individuals are unable to access such specialised services within their local community. A possible solution may be the delivery of care via telerehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate clinicians' perspectives on providing clinical care via telerehabilitation during the early implementation of a novel spinal telerehabilitation service. Eight clinicians' were recruited, completing surveys at four separate time points. Confidence in providing treatment via telerehabilitation significantly improved with time (χ

Indexed as

Clinician perspectiveMusculoskeletalPost-implementationTelehealthTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30588279
PMCPMC6296799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.