Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30588211›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2018

Insect Antennal Morphology: The Evolution of Diverse Solutions to Odorant Perception.

Mark A Elgar, Dong Zhang, Qike Wang, Bernadette Wittwer, Hieu Thi Pham, Tamara L Johnson, Christopher B Freelance, Marianne Coquilleau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rewiring the Vehicle:Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark A ElgarSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dong ZhangSchool of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Qike WangSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bernadette WittwerSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hieu Thi PhamSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tamara L JohnsonSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher B FreelanceSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marianne CoquilleauSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical communication involves the production, transmission, and perception of odors. Most adult insects rely on chemical signals and cues to locate food resources, oviposition sites or reproductive partners and, consequently, numerous odors provide a vital source of information. Insects detect these odors with receptors mostly located on the antennae, and the diverse shapes and sizes of these antennae (and sensilla) are both astonishing and puzzling: what selective pressures are responsible for these different solutions to the same problem - to perceive signals and cues? This review describes the selection pressures derived from chemical communication that are responsible for shaping the diversity of insect antennal morphology. In particular, we highlight new technologies and techniques that offer exciting opportunities for addressing this surprisingly neglected and yet crucial component of chemical communication.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionOdorantsAnimalsArthropod Antennaeantennaechemical communicationinsectsreceiver morphologysignal perception

Identifiers

PMID30588211
PMCPMC6302626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.