Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587975›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Detection of

Netrapal Singh, Bhawna Dahiya, Venkatraman Srinivasan Radhakrishnan, Tulika Prasad, Promod K Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Rapid Genotyping ofBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Protein Quantitation and Analysis of Purity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Netrapal SinghCentre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, pkmehta@hotmail.com.
Bhawna DahiyaCentre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, pkmehta@hotmail.com.
Venkatraman Srinivasan RadhakrishnanAdvanced Instrumentation Research & Facility (AIRF) and Special Centre for Nanoscience (SCNS), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, Delhi, India, prasadtulika@hotmail.com.
Tulika PrasadAdvanced Instrumentation Research & Facility (AIRF) and Special Centre for Nanoscience (SCNS), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, Delhi, India, prasadtulika@hotmail.com.
Promod K MehtaCentre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, pkmehta@hotmail.com.
Maharshi Dayanand University · INCentral University of Haryana · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmuno-PCR (I-PCR), an ultrasensitive method, combines the versatility of ELISA with the exponential amplification capacity of PCR. Coupling of detection antibodies with the reporter DNA is a critical step of I-PCR. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and magnetic beads (MBs) are relatively easy to attach with the antibodies and DNA. Therefore, we designed MB-coupled GNP-based I-PCR (MB-GNP-I-PCR) assay for the detection of

methodsGNPs were synthesized by chemical reduction and seed-mediated synthesis. Functionalized GNPs were prepared by coupling GNPs with the detection antibodies and reporter DNA and were characterized. Detection limit of

resultsTransmission electron microscopy revealed spherical and slightly polydispersed GNPs of ~20 and ~60 nm size. Coupling of antibodies to GNPs was indicated by a shift in absorption maxima from 524 to 534 nm, which was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. A color reaction with ELISA and the presence of 76 bp product by PCR further validated the coupling of detection antibodies and signal DNA to the functionalized GNPs. Also, attachment of capture antibodies with MBs was confirmed by magneto-ELISA. Detection limit of purified ESAT-6 by MB-GNP-I-PCR was determined to be 10 fg/mL, 10

conclusionUnlike conventional I-PCR (solid format), MB-GNP-I-PCR (liquid format) is relatively simple with the reduced background signals, which can be further exploited for the clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Magnetic PhenomenaAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsGoldHumansLimit of DetectionMetal NanoparticlesMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionTuberculosisAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsESAT-6 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisGoldELISAfunctionalized GNPsLODMB-GNP-I-PCR

Identifiers

PMID30587975
PMCPMC6296691
OpenAlexW2904930049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.