Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587950›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2019

Understanding experiences of patients and family caregivers in the Mayo Clinic Care Transitions program: a qualitative study.

Paul Y Takahashi, Dawn M Finnie, Stephanie M Quigg, Lynn S Borkenhagen, Ashok Kumbamu, Ashley K Kimeu, Joan M Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul Y TakahashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, takahashi.paul@mayo.edu.
Dawn M FinnieRobert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Stephanie M QuiggDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, takahashi.paul@mayo.edu.
Lynn S BorkenhagenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, takahashi.paul@mayo.edu.
Ashok KumbamuRobert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashley K KimeuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, takahashi.paul@mayo.edu.
Joan M GriffinRobert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare transitions programs are increasingly used to improve care and reduce re-admission of patients after hospitalization. To learn from the experience of patients who have participated in the Mayo Clinic Care Transitions (MCCT) program and to understand the patient experience, we sought perspectives of patients, caregivers, and providers who worked with participants of the MCCT program.

methodsInvestigators interviewed 17 patients and nine of their caregivers about their experience with the MCCT program. Eight health care providers described provider experiences with the MCCT program. Data from semistructured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and evaluated through content analysis. Inductive coding methods were used to elicit themes about patient experience with the MCCT program.

resultsPatients, caregivers, and providers emphasized that the MCCT program prevented hospitalizations and contributed to the health and quality of life of participants. All three stakeholder groups emphasized the value of the home visit and provision of the visit on a patient's "home turf" as central to the program. Patients appreciated speaking to a provider without the stress and exertion of a trip to the clinic. Caregivers appreciated improved communication provided in the home visit and felt that home visits gave them peace of mind. Patients, caregivers, and providers also identified the need for improved phone triage and communication.

conclusionPatients, caregivers, and providers acknowledged the care transitions problem and emphasized the benefits of seeing patients on their home turf rather than in an office visit. This qualitative study of patient, caregiver, and provider experiences further validates the importance of the MCCT program.

Indexed as

Patient TransferQuality of LifeAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCommunicationFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalizationHouse CallsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfactiongeriatricshome carehospitalizationnurse practitionerprogram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30587950
PMCPMC6304078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.