Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587935›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2018

Patient-reported outcomes in individuals with hepatitis C virus infection treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir.

Xinyi Ng, Chizoba Nwankwo, Jean Marie Arduino, Shelby Corman, Kathryn Eilene Lasch, Jacqueline Mary Lustrino, Sushma Patel, Heather Loryn Platt, Jingjun Qiu, Jan Sperl

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02358044 (A Phase III, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen of MK-5172/MK-8742 Versus Sofosbuvir/Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02358044 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen of MK-5172/MK-8742 Versus Sofosbuvir/Pegylated Interferon/Ribavirin (PR) in Treatment-Naïve and PR Prior Treatment Failure Subjects With Chronic HCV GT1, 4 or 6 Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2016Enrolled257ConditionsHepatitis CArmsSofosbuvir, PegIntron, Ribavirin, Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (100 mg/50 mg) FDC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinyi NgPharmerit International, LP, Bethesda, MD, USA, xng@pharmerit.com.
Chizoba NwankwoMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Jean Marie ArduinoMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Shelby CormanPharmerit International, LP, Bethesda, MD, USA, xng@pharmerit.com.
Kathryn Eilene LaschPharmerit International, LP, Bethesda, MD, USA, xng@pharmerit.com.
Jacqueline Mary LustrinoPharmerit International, LP, Bethesda, MD, USA, xng@pharmerit.com.
Sushma PatelMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Heather Loryn PlattMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Jingjun QiuMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Jan SperlDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USPharmerit (United States) · USInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have diminished patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This study aimed to compare the impact of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) treatment versus sofosbuvir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (SOF/PR) on changes in PROs: 1) during the treatment period and 2) at posttreatment follow-up. PATIENTS AND

methodsPRO data collected during the Phase III C-EDGE Head-2-Head (H2H) open-label study was analyzed. In this trial, patients infected with HCV were randomized 1:1 to receive either EBR/GZR or SOF/PR for 12 weeks. Patients self-administered the Short Form-36 version 2 (SF-36v2

resultsThere were 255 patients (99.2% White, 54.1% female, 74.9% treatment naïve) included in the analysis. During the treatment period, significant declines in SF-36v2 scores were observed across all domains for the SOF/PR group. Compared to the SOF/PR group, the EBR/GZR group reported more improvement in scores across all SF-36v2 domain scores at the end of the treatment period. At treatment week 12, the between-group differences for 6 out of the 8 domain scores for these patients reflected at least moderate effects (effect sizes >0.5). No significant between-group differences in change in SF-36v2 scores from baseline were detected posttreatment. The decline in SF-36v2 scores observed during the treatment period for the SOF/PR group returned to near baseline scores or above posttreatment. Treatment with EBR/GZR did not impact fatigue scores, but treatment with SOF/PR led to increased fatigue scores during treatment which resolved by posttreatment follow-up week 12.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that HCV treatment with EBR/GZR resulted in a significantly better PRO profile as compared to SOF/PR. PROs are an important consideration as worsening PROs experienced during treatment may negatively influence adherence and ultimately contribute to an unfavorable clinical outcome. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02358044.

Indexed as

direct-acting antiviralsfatiguehealth-related quality of lifehepatitispatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30587935
PMCPMC6294167
OpenAlexW2904854612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.