ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2018
Retraction Statement.
Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been brought to our attention that the paper entitled “Diagnostic efficacy of adenosine deaminase levels in cerebrospinal fluid in patients of tubercular meningitis: A comparison with polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis” [Ann of Neurosciences 2010; 17(3): 126–130] written by Chacko F, Modi M, Lal V, Prabhakar S, Rana SV, Arora SK, submitted by the second author has been found to be simultaneously published in another journal with many of the authors being common. (Please also see our Expression of Concern published in 2015). The editors have informed the Institute of this duplication. Now, the corresponding author has communicated to us and retracted the above-mentioned paper. We apologize to those scientists and committees who might have been influenced by the content and conclusions of the this paper published in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.