ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2018
Analysis of late adverse events and their chronological changes after radiation therapy for cervical cancer.
Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis on vaginal radiotherapy for gynecological cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Diagnostic Framework of Pelvic Massive Necrosis with Peritonitis following Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: When Is the Surgery Not Demandable? A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Morphological Characteristics and Clinical Significance of Different Types of Tumor Vessels in Patients with Stages I-IIA of Squamous Cervical Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several late adverse events occur after radiation therapy (RT) for cervical cancer. However, there has been little reported about their chronological changes. It is still unclear whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) increases late complications. We aimed to evaluate the late adverse events and their chronological changes and whether CCRT increases their incidence and severity. For this purpose, we retrospectively analyzed 157 women with histologically proven cervical cancer. We reviewed all late adverse events and compared the frequency and severity between the patients who underwent CCRT and those who underwent RT alone. We calculated the cumulative occurrence rates of late adverse events stratified by the site and severity, and determined the chronological changes. With survivors' median follow-up time of 74.3 months, late adverse events occurred in 49.0% and serious complications developed in 24.2% of all patients. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rate of all late adverse events between the CCRT and RT-alone groups (p = 0.720). The incidence rate of rectal bleeding was 25.5%. Serious rectal bleeding developed in 5 patients, all within 20 months from the start of RT. Importantly, the symptoms of rectal bleeding disappeared or were relieved in most patients during follow-up. In conclusion, we evaluated the late adverse events and their chronological changes after RT for cervical cancer and showed that adding chemotherapy to RT did not affect the frequency and severity of late complications, and the symptoms of rectal bleeding were relieved over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.