Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587586›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Fixation probabilities in weakly compressible fluid flows.

Abigail Plummer, Roberto Benzi, David R Nelson, Federico Toschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Turbulent mixing controls fixation of growing antagonistic populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hydrodynamic flow and concentration gradients in the gut enhance neutral bacterial diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail PlummerDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; plummer@g.harvard.edu.
Roberto BenziDepartment of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5335-7068
David R NelsonDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Federico ToschiDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-2332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competition between biological species in marine environments is affected by the motion of the surrounding fluid. An effective 2D compressibility can arise, for example, from the convergence and divergence of water masses at the depth at which passively traveling photosynthetic organisms are restricted to live. In this report, we seek to quantitatively study genetics under flow. To this end, we couple an off-lattice agent-based simulation of two populations in 1D to a weakly compressible velocity field-first a sine wave and then a shell model of turbulence. We find for both cases that even in a regime where the overall population structure is approximately unaltered, the flow can significantly diminish the effect of a selective advantage on fixation probabilities. We understand this effect in terms of the enhanced survival of organisms born at sources in the flow and the influence of Fisher genetic waves.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalOceans and SeasSeawaterPlanktonProbabilityFisher wavespopulation geneticsselective advantagestochastic processesturbulence

Identifiers

PMID30587586
PMCPMC6329946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.