ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
Does
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Profiling ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Significance of Mutation Spots and Concurrent Gene Mutations on Prognosis and Clinical Outcomes in Myelodysplastic Syndromes With SF3B1 Mutation.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- SF3B1: from core splicing factor to oncogenic driver.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Prognostic Role of SETDB2 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Linking Immune Infiltration, Cuproptosis, and Tumor Suppression.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Molecular genetic characterization of myeloid neoplasms with idic(X)(q13) and i(X)(q10).Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Identification of HOXB9 to predict prognosis of endometrial cancer based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Roles of ten-eleven translocation family proteins and their O-linked β-N-acetylglucosaminylated forms in cancer development.Oncology letters · 2021Review
- Progression, transformation, and unusual manifestations of myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasms: lessons learned from the XIV European Bone Marrow Working Group Course 2019.Annals of hematology · 2021Article
- Mutations in Splicing Factor Genes in Myeloid Malignancies: Significance and Impact on Clinical Features.Cancers · 2019Review
- Co-mutation ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMutations in splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1) have been reported to be associated with a favorable prognosis, while the prognostic impact of tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) mutations is still controversial. The clinical significance of combined SF3B1 and TET2 mutation is even more uncertain. In this study, the clinical consequences of concurrent double SF3B1/TET2 mutation were compared with isolated SF3B1 or TET2 mutation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe demographics, diagnosis, cytogenetic abnormalities, and overall survival time of 130 patients with isolated SF3B1 (n=48) or TET2 mutation (n=54), or double SF3B1/TET2 mutation (n=28) were compared by next-generation sequencing.
resultsPatients with double mutation were found to be significantly older than patients with isolated TET2 mutation. Patients with double mutation or isolated SF3B1 mutation were less likely to be diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia than patients with isolated TET2 mutation. Patients with myelodysplasia had a higher percentage of double or isolated SF3B1 mutation, while patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms had a higher percentage of isolated TET2 mutation. Patients with double mutation more frequently had increased ring sideroblasts similarly to patients with isolated SF3B1 mutation. The percentage of patients with normal cytogenetics or good cytogenetic abnormalities was significantly higher in patients with double mutation than those with isolated mutation. Finally, in patients with myelodysplasia and normal cytogenetics, the median survival time in those with double mutation was significantly longer than in those with isolated SF3B1 mutation, even though the overall survival curve was not statistically significant.
conclusionTET2 mutation appeared not to have additional effects when combined with SF3B1, and patients with double mutation appeared to have at least as, good as or even better prognosis than patients with isolated mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.