Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587242›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2018

DNA methylation age is not affected in psoriatic skin tissue.

Changbing Shen, Leilei Wen, Randy Ko, Jing Gao, Xue Shen, Xianbo Zuo, Liangdan Sun, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Xuejun Zhang, Yong Cui and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Metagenomics reveals unique gut mycobiome biomarkers in psoriasis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  6. A case-control study: epigenetic age acceleration in psoriasis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Psoriasis, Is It a Microdamage of Our "Sixth Sense"? A Neurocentric View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Changbing ShenInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Leilei WenInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Randy KoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Jing GaoDepartment of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, China.
Xue ShenInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Xianbo ZuoInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Liangdan SunInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Yi-Hsiang HsuHebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02131, USA.
Xuejun ZhangInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Yong CuiDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China. wuhucuiyong@vip.163.com.
Meng WangDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mengwang55@gmail.com.
Fusheng ZhouInstitute and Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China. biozhoufs@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-2801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsoriasis (Ps) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease. The keratinocytes of psoriatic skin defy normal apoptosis and exhibit active cell proliferation. Aberrant DNA methylation (DNAm) has been suggested relevant through regulating the expression of Ps susceptibility genes. However, it is unclear whether the biological age inferred from DNA methylome is affected.

resultsTo address the above issue, we applied a recently developed methylation clock model to our Chinese Han population dataset, which includes DNAm data of 114 involved psoriatic skin tissues (PP) and 41 uninvolved psoriatic skin tissues (PN) from Ps patients, and 62 normal skin tissues (NN) from health controls. We first confirmed the applicability of the clock in PN and NN. We then showed that PP samples have largely unchanged DNAm age, and that no association was observed between available clinical features and DNAm age acceleration. Examination of genome-wide CpGs yielded age-associated CpGs with concordant age-association coefficients among the three groups, which was also supported by an external dataset. We also interestingly observed two clock CpGs differentially methylated between PP and PN.

conclusionsOverall, our results suggest no significant alteration in DNAm age in PN and PP. Therefore, the increase in keratinocyte proliferation and alteration in DNAm caused by Ps may not affect the biological age of psoriatic skin tissue.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdolescentAdultAgedAgingCase-Control StudiesCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsoriasisYoung AdultChinese Han populationDNA methylation agePsoriasisSkin tissue

Identifiers

PMID30587242
PMCPMC6307188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.