ArticleBMC cancer2018
Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence and metastases after radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Article
- Positive surgical margin and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in different Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment risk groups.BJU international · 2025Article
- Can a nomogram predict apical prostate cancer pathology upgrade from fusion biopsy to final pathology? A multicenter study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy.Central European journal of urology · 2021Article
- Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are no published studies on the simultaneous effect of extent and location of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). The aim was to report the incidence, extent, and location of PSMs over the inclusion period as well as the rates of BCR and cancer-related mortality, and determine if BCR is associated with PSM extent and/or location.
methodsRetrospective review of 530 consecutive patients who underwent RALP between 2003 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox regressions were performed to determine variables associated with BCR.
resultsFor the 530 operated patients, evaluated at a median of 92 months (IQR, 87-99), PSMs were observed in 156 (29%), of which 24% were focal. Out of 172 PSMs, 126 (73%) were focal and 46 (27%) were extensive. The KM survival using BCR as endpoint was 0.81 (CI, 0.78-0.85) at 5 years and was 0.67 (CI, 0.61-0.72) at 10 years; and using cancer-related mortality as endpoint was 0.99 (CI, 0.99-1.00) at 5 years and 0.95 (CI, 0.92-0.98) at 10 years. Multi-variable analysis revealed the strongest predictors of BCR to be Gleason score ≥ 8 (HR = 7.97; CI, 4.38-14.51) and 4 + 3 (HR = 3.88; CI, 2.12-7.07), lymph nodes invasion (HR = 3.42; CI, 1.70-6.91), pT stage 3b or 4 (HR = 3.07; CI, 1.93-4.90), and extensive apical PSMs (HR = 2.62; CI, 1.40-4.90) but not focal apical PSMs (HR = 0.86; CI, 0.49-1.50; p = 0.586).
conclusionExtensive apical PSMs significantly increased the risk of BCR, independently from pT stage, Gleason score and lymph nodes invasion, while focal apical PSMs had no significant effect on BCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.