Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587138›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

Mechanisms, contexts and points of contention: operationalizing realist-informed research for complex health interventions.

James Shaw, Carolyn Steele Gray, G Ross Baker, Jean-Louis Denis, Mylaine Breton, Jennifer Gutberg, Gaya Embuldeniya, Peter Carswell, Annette Dunham, Ann McKillop and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How Is Equity-Based Co-Creation Enacted in Health and Social Services? An Evaluation of Four Case Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

James ShawWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, Canada. Jay.shaw@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-0756
Carolyn Steele GrayUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
G Ross BakerUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
Jean-Louis DenisHealth Policy and management, Canada research chair on health system design and adaptation, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, CRCHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Mylaine BretonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche hôpital Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Canada.
Jennifer GutbergUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
Gaya EmbuldeniyaUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.
Peter CarswellSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Annette DunhamUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ann McKillopSchool of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Timothy KenealyDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicolette SheridanSchool of Nursing, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Walter WodchisUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 297942CIHR TTF-128263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of "mechanism" is central to realist approaches to research, yet research teams struggle to operationalize and apply the concept in empirical research. Our large, interdisciplinary research team has also experienced challenges in making the concept useful in our study of the implementation of models of integrated community-based primary health care (ICBPHC) in three international jurisdictions (Ontario and Quebec in Canada, and in New Zealand).

methodsIn this paper we summarize definitions of mechanism found in realist methodological literature, and report an empirical example of a realist analysis of the implementation ICBPHC.

resultsWe use our empirical example to illustrate two points. First, the distinction between contexts and mechanisms might ultimately be arbitrary, with more distally located mechanisms becoming contexts as research teams focus their analytic attention more proximally to the outcome of interest. Second, the relationships between mechanisms, human reasoning, and human agency need to be considered in greater detail to inform realist-informed analysis; understanding these relationships is fundamental to understanding the ways in which mechanisms operate through individuals and groups to effect the outcomes of complex health interventions.

conclusionsWe conclude our paper with reflections on human agency and outline the implications of our analysis for realist research and realist evaluation.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationBiomedical ResearchEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNew ZealandOntarioPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareQuebecResearch DesignComplex health interventionsContextImplementationMechanismsPrimary health careRealismRealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30587138
PMCPMC6307288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.