Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587126›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Genome rearrangements and selection in multi-chromosome bacteria Burkholderia spp.

Olga O Bochkareva, Elena V Moroz, Iakov I Davydov, Mikhail S Gelfand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Colony morphotype variation inJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  7. Completed genomes fromCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genomic analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterization ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olga O BochkarevaKharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia. olga.bochkaryova@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-6639
Elena V MorozKharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia.
Iakov I DavydovDepartment of Ecology and Evolution & Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mikhail S GelfandKharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Foundation of Basic Research 16-54-21004Russian Science Foundation 18-14-00358Swiss National Science Foundation IZLRZ3\163872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Burkholderia consists of species that occupy remarkably diverse ecological niches. Its best known members are important pathogens, B. mallei and B. pseudomallei, which cause glanders and melioidosis, respectively. Burkholderia genomes are unusual due to their multichromosomal organization, generally comprised of 2-3 chromosomes.

resultsWe performed integrated genomic analysis of 127 Burkholderia strains. The pan-genome is open with the saturation to be reached between 86,000 and 88,000 genes. The reconstructed rearrangements indicate a strong avoidance of intra-replichore inversions that is likely caused by selection against the transfer of large groups of genes between the leading and the lagging strands. Translocated genes also tend to retain their position in the leading or the lagging strand, and this selection is stronger for large syntenies. Integrated reconstruction of chromosome rearrangements in the context of strains phylogeny reveals parallel rearrangements that may indicate inversion-based phase variation and integration of new genomic islands. In particular, we detected parallel inversions in the second chromosomes of B. pseudomallei with breakpoints formed by genes encoding membrane components of multidrug resistance complex, that may be linked to a phase variation mechanism. Two genomic islands, spreading horizontally between chromosomes, were detected in the B. cepacia group.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the power of integrated analysis of pan-genomes, chromosome rearrangements, and selection regimes. Non-random inversion patterns indicate selective pressure, inversions are particularly frequent in a recent pathogen B. mallei, and, together with periods of positive selection at other branches, may indicate adaptation to new niches. One such adaptation could be a possible phase variation mechanism in B. pseudomallei.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialBurkholderiaDatabases, GeneticGene RearrangementPhylogenyBurkholderiaComparative genomicsGenome rearrangementsMulti-chromosome bacteriaPan-genomePositive selectionStrain phylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30587126
PMCPMC6307245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.