Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30587042›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2019

Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine.

Mallory K Ellingson, Matthew Z Dudley, Rupali J Limaye, Daniel A Salmon, Sean T O'Leary, Saad B Omer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04678271 (Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, Exchange), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04678271 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, Exchange (AFIX-OB) A Customizable Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Maternal Vaccine Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled202ConditionsInfluenza, Whooping CoughArmsAFIX-OB Quality Improvement Package
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mallory K Ellingsona Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Matthew Z Dudleyb Department of International Health , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Rupali J Limayeb Department of International Health , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Daniel A Salmonb Department of International Health , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Sean T O'Learyf Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital , Aurora , CO , USA.
Saad B Omera Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USEmory University · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

A Comprehensive Pre-Natal Intervention to Increase Vaccine CoverageR01AI110482 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNARCZYK, ROBERT A., SALMON, DANIEL A · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfluenza vaccination during pregnancy can offer many benefits to both mother and infant. Despite recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, vaccine coverage rates among pregnant women during pregnancy are below 40% in the United States. There is a need for a greater understanding of what interventions can improve vaccine uptake among pregnant women. AREAS COVERED: This review synthesizes the existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to improve maternal influenza vaccine uptake. These interventions are examined within the framework of the three psychological propositions: thoughts and feelings, social processes and changing behavior directly. EXPERT COMMENTARY: A number of promising and effective interventions were identified in this review. Nudge-based interventions that build on favorable intentions to vaccinate such as provider prompts and standing orders have demonstrated significant success in improving influenza vaccine uptake. However, substantial gaps in the literature still exist. Provider recommendations are the most important predictor of vaccine receipt among pregnant women, yet few studies evaluated intervening to improve the dialogue between patient and provider. With the potential for even more vaccines to be added to the maternal immunization schedule, it is vitally important to understand how to improve uptake.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousUnited StatesVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesInfluenzainterventionsmaternal immunizationpregnancyvaccinationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID30587042
PMCPMC6378696
OpenAlexW2907387857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.