Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586842›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2018

Nanoparticle-Based Biosensing of Tuberculosis, an Affordable and Practical Alternative to Current Methods.

Nirajan Bhusal, Sunaina Shrestha, Nisha Pote, Evangelyn C Alocilja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Carbapenem-ResistantNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nucleic Acids Detection forBiosensors · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Glycan Nanobiosensors.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nirajan BhusalDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Kavrepalanchok, Nepal. nirajanbhusal@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6926-0634
Sunaina ShresthaDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Kavrepalanchok, Nepal. stha.sunaina@gmail.com.
Nisha PoteDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel 45200, Kavrepalanchok, Nepal. potenisha@gmail.com.
Evangelyn C AlociljaGlobal Alliance for Rapid Diagnostics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. alocilja@msu.edu.
Dhulikhel Hospital · NPMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to community-based point-of-care, low-cost, and sensitive tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics remains an unmet need.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to combine principles in nanotechnology, TB biology, glycochemistry, and engineering, for the development of a nanoparticle-based colorimetric biosensing assay (NCBA) to quickly and inexpensively detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in sputum samples.

methodsIn NCBA, the isolation of AFB from sputum samples was accomplished through glycan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (GMNP) interacting with AFB and then using a simple magnet to separate the GMNP-AFB complex. Acid-fastness and cording properties of mycobacteria were utilized to provide visually observable red-stained clumps of bacteria that were surrounded by brown nanoparticles under a light microscope on prepared smears. The NCBA technique was compared against sputum smear microscopy (SSM) and Xpert MTB/RIF in 500 samples from patients that were suspected to have TB.

resultsStatistical analysis showed that NCBA had sensitivity and specificity performances in perfect agreement with Xpert MTB/RIF as gold standard for all 500 samples. SSM had a sensitivity of 40% for the same samples.

conclusionNCBA technique yielded full agreement in terms of sensitivity and specificity with the Xpert MTB/RIF in 500 samples. The method is completed in 10⁻20 min through a simple process at an estimated cost of $0.10 per test. Implementation of NCBA in rural communities would help to increase case finding and case notification, and would support programs against drug-resistance. Its use at the first point-of-contact by patients in the healthcare system would facilitate quick treatment in a single clinical encounter, thus supporting the global "End TB Strategy" by 2035.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesHumansNanoparticlesParticle SizePoint-of-Care SystemsSensitivity and SpecificitySputumSurface PropertiesTuberculosisacid-fast bacilliColorimetric assayExpert MTB/RIFpulmonary TBsputum microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30586842
PMCPMC6468399
OpenAlexW2906529755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.