ArticleCirculation2019
Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Circulation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HRB open research · 2021Pooled it
- Why atrial fibrillation ablation remains underused in EuroAsia Task Force countries: insights from the ESC-EHRA Atlas and a regional survey.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes in Lower-Extremity Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Insights From the NCDR Peripheral Vascular Intervention Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- The Jailed Stent-Balloon Bifurcation Stenting Technique.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Disparities by Race and Ethnicity in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Earlier the Better.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Retrospective Analysis of the Thai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry: Impacts of Center Volume and Operator Experience on Outcomes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Combination therapy with moderate-intensity atorvastatin and ezetimibe vs. high-intensity atorvastatin monotherapy in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in practice: assessing RACING generalizability.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025 · on this mapObservational
- Long-term outcomes and operators' experience in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Gender Disparities in Japanese Interventional Cardiology: Outcomes of Female Operators in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Article
- Case Volumes and Outcomes Among Early-Career Interventional Cardiologists in the United States.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Time to Transfer as a Quality Improvement Imperative: Implications of a Hub-and-Spoke Health System Model on the Timing of Emergency Procedures.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023Article
- Effect of delayed hospitalization on patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Kidney Injury in Acute Coronary Syndromes: More Than a Canary in the Cardiovascular Coal Mine?JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2023Article
- Center Volumes Correlate with Likelihood of Stent Implantation in German Coronary Angiography.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Completeness of intervention description in invasive cardiology trials: an observational study ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough many studies show an inverse association between operator procedural volume and short-term adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the association between procedural volume and longer-term outcomes is unknown.
methodsUsing the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry data linked with Medicare claims data, we examined the association between operator PCI volume and long-term outcomes among patients ≥65 years of age. Operators were stratified by average annual PCI volume (counting PCIs performed in patients of all ages): low- (<50 PCIs), intermediate- (50-100), and high- (>100) volume operators. One-year unadjusted rates of death and major adverse coronary events (MACEs; defined as death, readmission for myocardial infarction, or unplanned coronary revascularization) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. The proportional hazards assumption was not met, and risk-adjusted associations between operator volume and outcomes were calculated separately from the time of PCI to hospital discharge and from hospital discharge to 1-year follow-up.
resultsBetween July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, 723 644 PCI procedures were performed by 8936 operators: 2553 high-, 2878 intermediate-, and 3505 low-volume operators. Compared with high- and intermediate-volume operators, low-volume operators more often performed emergency PCI, and their patients had fewer cardiovascular comorbidities. Over 1-year follow-up, 15.9% of patients treated by low-volume operators had a MACE compared with 16.9% of patients treated by high-volume operators ( P=0.004). After multivariable adjustment, intermediate- and high-volume operators had a significantly lower rate of in-hospital death than low-volume operators (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96 for intermediate versus low; odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83 for high versus low). There were no significant differences in rates of MACEs, death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization between operator cohorts from hospital discharge to 1-year follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio for MACEs, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01 for intermediate versus low; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04 for high versus low).
conclusionsUnadjusted 1-year outcomes after PCI were worse for older adults treated by operators with higher annual volume; however, patients treated by these operators had more cardiovascular comorbidities. After risk adjustment, higher operator volume was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and no difference in postdischarge MACEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.