Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586696›Full record

ArticleCirculation2019

Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Alexander C Fanaroff, Pearl Zakroysky, Daniel Wojdyla, Lisa A Kaltenbach, Matthew W Sherwood, Matthew T Roe, Tracy Y Wang, Eric D Peterson, Hitinder S Gurm, Mauricio G Cohen and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Jailed Stent-Balloon Bifurcation Stenting Technique.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Retrospective Analysis of the Thai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry: Impacts of Center Volume and Operator Experience on Outcomes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander C FanaroffDivision of Cardiology (A.C.F., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Pearl ZakroyskyDuke Clinical Research Institute (A.C.F., P.Z., D.W., L.A.K., M.W.S., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Daniel WojdylaDuke Clinical Research Institute (A.C.F., P.Z., D.W., L.A.K., M.W.S., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Lisa A KaltenbachDuke Clinical Research Institute (A.C.F., P.Z., D.W., L.A.K., M.W.S., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Matthew W SherwoodDuke Clinical Research Institute (A.C.F., P.Z., D.W., L.A.K., M.W.S., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Matthew T RoeDivision of Cardiology (A.C.F., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Tracy Y WangDivision of Cardiology (A.C.F., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Eric D PetersonDivision of Cardiology (A.C.F., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Hitinder S GurmDivision of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (H.S.G.).
Mauricio G CohenDivision of Cardiology, University of Miami, FL (M.G.C.).
John C MessengerDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.C.M.).
Sunil V RaoDivision of Cardiology (A.C.F., M.T.R., T.Y.W., E.D.P., S.V.R.), Duke University, Durham, NC.
Duke University · USClinical Research Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many studies show an inverse association between operator procedural volume and short-term adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the association between procedural volume and longer-term outcomes is unknown.

methodsUsing the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI registry data linked with Medicare claims data, we examined the association between operator PCI volume and long-term outcomes among patients ≥65 years of age. Operators were stratified by average annual PCI volume (counting PCIs performed in patients of all ages): low- (<50 PCIs), intermediate- (50-100), and high- (>100) volume operators. One-year unadjusted rates of death and major adverse coronary events (MACEs; defined as death, readmission for myocardial infarction, or unplanned coronary revascularization) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. The proportional hazards assumption was not met, and risk-adjusted associations between operator volume and outcomes were calculated separately from the time of PCI to hospital discharge and from hospital discharge to 1-year follow-up.

resultsBetween July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, 723 644 PCI procedures were performed by 8936 operators: 2553 high-, 2878 intermediate-, and 3505 low-volume operators. Compared with high- and intermediate-volume operators, low-volume operators more often performed emergency PCI, and their patients had fewer cardiovascular comorbidities. Over 1-year follow-up, 15.9% of patients treated by low-volume operators had a MACE compared with 16.9% of patients treated by high-volume operators ( P=0.004). After multivariable adjustment, intermediate- and high-volume operators had a significantly lower rate of in-hospital death than low-volume operators (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96 for intermediate versus low; odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.83 for high versus low). There were no significant differences in rates of MACEs, death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization between operator cohorts from hospital discharge to 1-year follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio for MACEs, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01 for intermediate versus low; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04 for high versus low).

conclusionsUnadjusted 1-year outcomes after PCI were worse for older adults treated by operators with higher annual volume; however, patients treated by these operators had more cardiovascular comorbidities. After risk adjustment, higher operator volume was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and no difference in postdischarge MACEs.

Indexed as

WorkloadAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansMaleMedicareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Registriesmorbiditymortalityoutcome assessment (health care)percutaneous coronary interventionstents

Identifiers

PMID30586696
PMCPMC6340715
OpenAlexW2912226549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.