Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586467›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Factors associated with institutional delivery: Findings from a cross-sectional study in Mara and Kagera regions in Tanzania.

Dunstan R Bishanga, Mary Drake, Young-Mi Kim, Amasha H Mwanamsangu, Ahmad M Makuwani, Jeremie Zoungrana, Ruth Lemwayi, Marcus J Rijken, Jelle Stekelenburg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dunstan R BishangaJhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-5970-6604
Mary DrakeJhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Young-Mi KimJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Amasha H MwanamsanguJhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ahmad M MakuwaniTanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jeremie ZoungranaJhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ruth LemwayiJhpiego Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Marcus J RijkenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle StekelenburgUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Global Health, Health Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Tanzania, maternal mortality has stagnated over the last 10 years, and some of the areas with the worst indicators are in the Lake and Western Zones. This study investigates the factors associated with institutional deliveries among women aged 15-49 years in two regions of the Lake Zone. Data were extracted from a cross-sectional household survey of 1,214 women aged 15-49 years who had given birth in the 2 years preceding the survey in Mara and Kagera regions. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the influence of various factors on giving birth in a facility. About two-thirds (67.3%) of women gave birth at a health facility. After adjusting for possible confounders, six factors were significantly associated with institutional delivery: region (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54 [0.41-0.71]), number of children (aOR, 95% CI: 0.61 [0.42-0.91]), household wealth index (aOR, 95% CI: 1.47 [1.09-2.27]), four or more antenatal care visits (aOR, 95% CI: 1.97 [1.12-3.47]), knowing three or more pregnancy danger signs (aOR, 95% CI: 1.87 [1.27-2.76]), and number of birth preparations (aOR, 95% CI: 6.09 [3.32-11.18]). Another three factors related to antenatal care were also significant in the bivariate analysis, but these were not significantly associated with place of delivery after adjusting for all variables in an extended multivariable regression model. Giving birth in a health facility was associated both with socio-demographic factors and women's interactions with the health care system during pregnancy. The findings show that national policies and programs promoting institutional delivery in Tanzania should tailor interventions to specific regions and reach out to low-income and high-parity women. Efforts are needed not just to increase the number of antenatal care visits made by pregnant women, but also to improve the quality and content of the interaction between women and service providers.

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHome ChildbirthHumansLogistic ModelsMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedParityPregnancyPrenatal CareRural PopulationTanzania

Identifiers

PMID30586467
PMCPMC6306247
OpenAlexW2905612448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.