Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586420›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Non-consensual condom removal, reported by patients at a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia.

Rosie L Latimer, Lenka A Vodstrcil, Christopher K Fairley, Vincent J Cornelisse, Eric P F Chow, Tim R H Read, Catriona S Bradshaw

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stealthing among university students: associated factors.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Condoms, Trust and Stealthing: The Meanings Attributed to Unprotected Hetero-Sex.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. "You Do It without Their Knowledge." Assessing Knowledge and Perception ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosie L LatimerCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-3722
Lenka A VodstrcilCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christopher K FairleyCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Vincent J CornelisseCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-9677
Eric P F ChowCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tim R H ReadCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Catriona S BradshawCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-consensual removal of condoms, colloquially referred to as 'stealthing', is the removal of a condom during sex by a sexual partner when consent has been given for sex with a condom only.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to determine how commonly women and men who have sex with men (MSM) attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre had experienced stealthing, and analysed situational factors associated with the event. Responses were linked to demographic information extracted from patient files.

results1189 of 2883 women (41.2%), and 1063 of 3439 MSM (30.9%) attending the clinic during the study period completed the survey. Thirty-two percent of women (95% CI: 29%,35%) and 19% of MSM (95% CI: 17%,22%) reported having ever experienced stealthing. Women who had been stealthed were more likely to be a current sex worker (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.87, 95% CI: 2.01,4.11, p <0.001). MSM who had experienced stealthing were more likely to report anxiety or depression (AOR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.25,3.60, p = 0.005). Both female and male participants who had experienced stealthing were three times less likely to consider it to be sexual assault than participants who had not experienced it (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.22,0.4 and OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.21,0.45 respectively).

conclusionsA high proportion of women and MSM attending a sexual health service reported having experienced stealthing. While further investigation is needed into the prevalence of stealthing in the general community, clinicians should be aware of this practice and consider integrating this question into their sexual health consultation. Understanding situational factors would assist in the development of preventive strategies, particularly female sex workers and MSM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual Health

Identifiers

PMID30586420
PMCPMC6306234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.