Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586316›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Once Weekly or Once Every Two Weeks Administration of High-Dose Sunitinib in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors.

Maria Rovithi, Sophie L Gerritse, Richard J Honeywell, Albert J Ten Tije, Rita Ruijter, Godefridus J Peters, Jens Voortman, Mariette Labots, Henk M W Verheul

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tumor Drug Concentration and Phosphoproteomic Profiles After Two Weeks of Treatment With Sunitinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria RovithiVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sophie L GerritseVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Richard J HoneywellVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Albert J Ten TijeVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rita RuijterVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Godefridus J PetersVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jens VoortmanVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariette LabotsVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulVrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDose and schedule optimization of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is of utmost importance. On the basis of preclinical data, a phase I clinical trial of once weekly or once every 2 weeks administration of high-dose sunitinib in patients with refractory solid malignancies was conducted. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with advanced cancer refractory to standard treatment were eligible. With use of a standard 3 + 3 phase I design, patients received escalating doses of sunitinib, in 100 mg increments, starting at 200 mg once weekly. In both the once weekly and once every 2 weeks cohorts, 10 more patients were included at the maximum tolerated dose level. Primary end points were safety and tolerability.

resultsSixty-nine patients with advanced cancer, predominantly colorectal cancer (42%), were treated with this alternative dosing regimen. Maximum tolerated dose was established at 300 mg once weekly and 700 mg once every 2 weeks, resulting in nine- and 18-fold higher maximum plasma concentrations compared with standard dose, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with fatigue (81%), nausea (48%), and anorexia (33%) being the most frequent adverse events. The only grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event in 5% or more of patients was fatigue (6%). Sixty-three percent of patients had significant clinical benefit, with a 30% progression-free survival of 5 months or more.

conclusionSunitinib administered once weekly at 300 mg or once every 2 weeks at 700 mg is feasible, with comparable tolerability as daily administration. Administration of 700 mg once every 2 weeks can be considered as the most optimal schedule because of the highest maximum plasma concentration being reached. The promising preliminary antitumor activity of this alternative schedule in heavily pretreated patients warrants further clinical evaluation and might ultimately indicate a class characteristic of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSunitinibAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID30586316
PMCPMC6368417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.