Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30586168›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2019

The efficacy of whole human genome capture on ancient dental calculus and dentin.

Kirsten A Ziesemer, Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal, Allison E Mann, Bernd W Brandt, Krithivasan Sankaranarayanan, Andrew T Ozga, Menno Hoogland, Courtney A Hofman, Domingo C Salazar-García, Bruno Frohlich and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metagenomic peek into a corn mummy.Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Kirsten A ZiesemerFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jazmín Ramos-MadrigalNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allison E MannLaboratories of Molecular Anthropology and Microbiome Research and Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Bernd W BrandtDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Krithivasan SankaranarayananLaboratories of Molecular Anthropology and Microbiome Research and Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Andrew T OzgaSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Menno HooglandFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Courtney A HofmanLaboratories of Molecular Anthropology and Microbiome Research and Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Domingo C Salazar-GarcíaDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Bruno FrohlichDepartment of Anthropology, Hanover, New Hampshire.
George R MilnerDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Anne C StoneSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Mark AldenderferDepartment of Anthropology and Heritage Studies, University of California, Merced, California.
Cecil M LewisLaboratories of Molecular Anthropology and Microbiome Research and Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Corinne L HofmanFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christina WarinnerLaboratories of Molecular Anthropology and Microbiome Research and Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Hannes SchroederFaculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-0270
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Oklahoma · USArizona State University · USAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLDartmouth College · USIkerbasque · ESMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DEPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 319209Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 649307DK-TAF 5662National Science Foundation BCS 1516633National Science Foundation BCS‐1528698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDental calculus is among the richest known sources of ancient DNA in the archaeological record. Although most DNA within calculus is microbial, it has been shown to contain sufficient human DNA for the targeted retrieval of whole mitochondrial genomes. Here, we explore whether calculus is also a viable substrate for whole human genome recovery using targeted enrichment techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsTotal DNA extracted from 24 paired archaeological human dentin and calculus samples was subjected to whole human genome enrichment using in-solution hybridization capture and high-throughput sequencing.

resultsTotal DNA from calculus exceeded that of dentin in all cases, and although the proportion of human DNA was generally lower in calculus, the absolute human DNA content of calculus and dentin was not significantly different. Whole genome enrichment resulted in up to four-fold enrichment of the human endogenous DNA content for both dentin and dental calculus libraries, albeit with some loss in complexity. Recovering more on-target reads for the same sequencing effort generally improved the quality of downstream analyses, such as sex and ancestry estimation. For nonhuman DNA, comparison of phylum-level microbial community structure revealed few differences between precapture and postcapture libraries, indicating that off-target sequences in human genome-enriched calculus libraries may still be useful for oral microbiome reconstruction. DISCUSSION: While ancient human dental calculus does contain endogenous human DNA sequences, their relative proportion is low when compared with other skeletal tissues. Whole genome enrichment can help increase the proportion of recovered human reads, but in this instance enrichment efficiency was relatively low when compared with other forms of capture. We conclude that further optimization is necessary before the method can be routinely applied to archaeological samples.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientArchaeologyDental CalculusDentinFemaleGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansMaleSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Ancientancient DNAgenomicshybridization capturetarget enrichment

Identifiers

PMID30586168
PMCPMC6519167
OpenAlexW2905622830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.