ArticleJournal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention2019
Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization During an Acute Cardiac Hospitalization: A NATIONAL SAMPLE.
Article in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06795737 (Effectiveness and Safety of Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Safety of Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (ExCR) During the Vulnerable Period in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Different Intensities of Exercise and Cardiovascular Performance: A Review : Different Intensities of Exercise and pCardiovascular Performance.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Mediation analysis of activities of daily living and kinesiophobia in association between cardiac function and health status of patients with chronic heart failure.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- A mobilization poster stimulates early in-hospital rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: a prospective sequential-group study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation for older adults: current evidence and future potential.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2022Article
- Trends in the Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Japan Between 2010 and 2017 - An Epidemiological Survey.Circulation reports · 2021Article
- Frequency of Hazardous and Binge Drinking Alcohol Among Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients.The American journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Objective Quantification of In-Hospital Patient Mobilization after Cardiac Surgery Using Accelerometers: Selection, Use, and Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Health-related quality of life and associated factors in patients with myocardial infarction after returning to work: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) programs provide important services to hospitalized patients by delivering risk factor education, daily ambulation, and facilitation of referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. However, little is known about ICR utilization or practice patterns.
methodsWe examined the use of ICR, between January 2007 and June 2011, in a geographically and structurally diverse sample of US hospitals (Premier, Inc).
resultsAmong 458 hospitals, there were 1 343 537 admissions with a qualifying diagnosis for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Formal ICR was available at 223 (49%) of these hospitals. Overall, patient utilization of ICR was low (21.2%) and varied by indication. Utilization was highest in those undergoing cardiac surgery (43.3%) and lowest in patients with medically managed myocardial infarction (15.6%) or heart failure (10.6%). A larger bed count, the presence of cardiac interventional services, and Midwest location were associated with increased likelihood of a hospital having an ICR program. In multivariable hierarchical analysis adjusting for known hospital characteristics among hospitals that provided ICR, multiple patient factors were associated with a lower likelihood of ICR utilization, including older age, more comorbidities, female sex, and Medicare insurance, but unspecified hospital characteristics explained the vast majority of the variability.
conclusionsWe found substantial variation in the delivery of ICR across US hospitals and by patient condition. Overall, only a minority of eligible patients ever received ICR and fewer than half of hospitals treating cardiac patients provided formal ICR services. This substantial gap in the secondary prevention of heart disease warrants further investigation and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.