ArticleCritical care medicine2019
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Evaluating the Impact of Source-specific Order Sets for Sepsis on Empiric Antibiotic Selection in the Emergency Department.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Trial
- Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The relationship between sepsis bundle delay intervals and in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in ICU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers to Cardiogenic Shock Recognition: A Qualitative Analysis.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of a Nationwide Blood Culture Bottle Shortage in 2024 on Healthcare Facilities in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding Provider-Level Variation in Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Survey of Corticosteroid Use in Septic Shock.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of sepsis CDS tool knowledge and utilization among graduate medical trainees: insights to inform redesign in an academic health system.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Strengthening the use of artificial intelligence within healthcare delivery organizations: balancing regulatory compliance and patient safety.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Article
- Gamification in Critical Care Education and Practice.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.Trials · 2023Article
- Sepsis mortality and ICU length of stay after the implementation of an intensive care team in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Phenotypes of Sepsis in a Cohort of Hospitalized Patients According to Infection Site.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- The snapshot audit methodology: design, implementation and analysis of prospective observational cohort studies in surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Review
- Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with delayed second doses of antibiotics in sepsis at a large academic medical center.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Is patients' rurality associated with in-hospital sepsis death in US hospitals?Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires hospitals to report compliance with a sepsis treatment bundle as part of its Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. We used recently released data from this program to characterize national performance on the sepsis measure, known as SEP-1.
designCross-sectional study of United States hospitals participating in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System.
settingGeneral, short-stay, acute-care hospitals in the United States. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe examined the hospital factors associated with reporting SEP-1 data, the hospital factors associated with performance on the SEP-1 measure, and the relationship between SEP-1 performance and performance on other quality measures related to time-sensitive medical conditions. A total of 3,283 hospitals were eligible for the analysis, of which 2,851 (86.8%) reported SEP-1 performance data. SEP-1 reporting was more common in larger, nonprofit hospitals. The most common reason for nonreporting was an inadequate case volume. Among hospitals reporting SEP-1 performance data, overall bundle compliance was generally low, but it varied widely across hospitals (mean and SD: 48.9% ± 19.4%). Compared with hospitals with worse SEP-1 performance, hospitals with better SEP-1 performance tended to be smaller, for-profit, nonteaching, and with intermediate-sized ICUs. Better hospital performance on SEP-1 was associated with higher rates of timely head CT interpretation for stroke patients (rho = 0.16; p < 0.001), more frequent aspirin administration for patients with chest pain or heart attacks (rho = 0.24; p < 0.001) and shorter median time to electrocardiogram for patients with chest pain (rho = -0.12; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe majority of eligible hospitals reported SEP-1 data, and overall bundle compliance was highly variable. SEP-1 performance was associated with structural hospital characteristics and performance on other measures of hospital quality, providing preliminary support for SEP-1 performance as a marker of timely hospital sepsis care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.