ArticleChemosphere2019
Development, validation and integration of in silico models to identify androgen active chemicals.
Article in Chemosphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Insights from Toxinology in Mammalian Reproduction: A Systematic Review.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Methodological Challenges in the Application of QSAR Models for Chemical Prioritization and Toxicity Assessment: A Case Study on Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activity in Environmental Pollutant Mixtures.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
- Article
- QSAR Models for Predicting Oral Bioavailability and Volume of Distribution and Their Application in Mapping the TK Space of Endocrine Disruptors.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Prediction model for milk transfer of drugs by primarily evaluating the area under the curve using QSAR/QSPR.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- Novel machine learning models to predict endocrine disruption activity for high-throughput chemical screening.Frontiers in toxicology · 2022Article
- In Silico Models for Skin Sensitization and Irritation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Review ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Combined Naïve Bayesian, Chemical Fingerprints and Molecular Docking Classifiers to Model and Predict Androgen Receptor Binding Data for Environmentally- and Health-Sensitive Substances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- High-throughput toxicogenomic screening of chemicals in the environment using metabolically competent hepatic cell cultures.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- QSAR Models for Human Carcinogenicity: An Assessment Based on Oral and Inhalation Slope Factors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.Environmental science & technology · 2020Article
- Consensus versus Individual QSARs in Classification: Comparison on a Large-Scale Case Study.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are exposed to large numbers of environmental chemicals, some of which potentially interfere with the endocrine system. The identification of potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has gained increasing priority in the assessment of environmental hazards. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has developed the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) which aims to prioritize and screen potential EDCs. The Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) program has generated data using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays measuring activity of chemicals at multiple points along the androgen receptor (AR) activity pathway. In the present study, using a large and diverse data set of 1667 chemicals provided by the U.S. EPA from the combined ToxCast AR assays in the framework of the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA). Two models were built using ADMET Predictor™; one is based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) technology and the other uses a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm; one model is a Decision Tree (DT) developed in R; and two models make use of differently combined sets of structural alerts (SAs) automatically extracted by SARpy. We used two strategies to integrate predictions from single models; one is based on a majority vote approach and the other on prediction convergence. These strategies led to enhanced statistical performance in most cases. Moreover, the majority vote approach improved prediction coverage when one or more single models were not able to provide any estimations. This study integrates multiple in silico approaches as a virtual screening tool for use in risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.