Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30584554›Full record

ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2018

Biochemical Basis of Cyfluthrin and DDT Resistance in

Mohammad Amin Gorouhi, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi, Hassan Vatandoost, Ahmad Ali Enayati, Ahmad Raeisi, Mohamad Reza Abai, Yaser Salim-Abadie, Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd, Azim Paksa, Fatemeh Nikpoor

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Environmental persistence and transmission dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Effects ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Baseline Susceptibility ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Amin GorouhiDepartment of Vector Biology and Control, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad Ali OshaghiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan VatandoostDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Ali EnayatiMazendaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazendaran, Iran.
Ahmad RaeisiNational Programme Manager for Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
Mohamad Reza AbaiDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yaser Salim-AbadieDepartment of Health Service and Health Promotion, School of Health, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Ahmad Ali Hanafi-BojdDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azim PaksaDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh NikpoorDepartment of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsField mosquito specimens were collected from Chabahar Seaport, southeast corner of Iran, in 2015. Insecticide susceptibility and enzyme assays were conducted as recommended by WHO.

resultsMean enzyme ratios were 3.95 and 3.04 for α- esterases and 2.40 and 1.97 for β- esterases in the DDT and cyfluthrin- resistant populations correspondingly compared with the susceptible strain. The GSTs enzyme mean activity ratios were 5.07 and 2.55 in the DDT and cyfluthrin- resistant populations compared with the susceptible beech strain. The cytochrome p450s enzyme ratios were 1.11 and 1.28 in the DDT and cyfluthrin- resistant populations respectively compared with the susceptible beech strain.

conclusionMetabolic mechanisms play a crucial role in the development of DDT and cyfluthrin resistance in

Indexed as

Anopheles stephensiInsecticideMalariaResistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID30584554
PMCPMC6297723
OpenAlexW2894618828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.