Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30584281›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2018

Best tigecycline dosing for treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens in critically ill patients with different body weights.

Mohamed M Ibrahim, Abdulla M Abuelmatty, Gehan H Mohamed, Mohsen A Nasr, Amal K Hussein, Mohy El Deen Ebaed, Hatem A Sarhan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed M IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt, mzasklany@yahoo.com.
Abdulla M AbuelmattyDepartment of Pharmacy, Jahra Hospital, Jahra, Kuwait.
Gehan H MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohsen A NasrDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amal K HusseinDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Mohy El Deen EbaedDepartment of Biochemistry, Egyptian Ministry of Interior, Cairo, Egypt.
Hatem A SarhanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Minia University · EGAin Shams University · EGJahra Hospital · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intensive care unit (ICU) is a center of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. This is due to overuse of antibiotics in the treatment of critically ill patients. Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that belongs to the glycylcycline group. Tigecycline has been indicated in treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs).

objectiveThis study was done to discover the best dose regimen of tigecycline in treatment of cSSTIs and cIAIs, especially in patients who are critically ill and obese, for clinical outcomes and safety.

settingThe study was conducted in an adult ICU that consists of 25 beds in a general hospital and was conducted within 2 years. A total of 954 patients were screened in this study.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that compared the clinical outcomes of patients: mortality, ICU stay, and safety of using two different dose regimens of tigecycline between patients with different body weight who were treated for infections caused by MDR pathogens in the ICU. The study was conducted within 2 years. All results were collected from patients' files and were analyzed with SPSS version 20. MAIN OUTCOME: The study was implemented to figure out the best dose regimen of tigecycline to achieve a reduction in mortality, ICU stay, treatment duration, and secondary septic-shock incidence with minimum side effects in treatment of cSSTIs and cIAIs in patients with different body weight.

resultsThere was a significant improvement in mortality, ICU stay, recurrent infection by the same organism, duration of tigecycline treatment, number of patients who had first negative culture after starting treatment, secondary bacteremia, and secondary septic shock with patients who used high-dose regimens of tigecycline in different subgroups of body weight, with no significant difference in side effects.

conclusionThe use of high-dose tigecycline resulted in a significant enhancement in all clinical outcomes, especially mortality and ICU stay when used in treatment of overweight and obese patients with cSSTIs and cIAIs.

Indexed as

Body WeightDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedObesityRetrospective StudiesTigecyclineTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsTigecyclinecomplicated intra-abdominal infectionscomplicated skin and soft-tissue infectionsintensive care unitobese patientstigecycline

Identifiers

PMID30584281
PMCPMC6290867
OpenAlexW2903218934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.