Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30584271›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Post-marketing surveillance study of the safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion or noninfectious posterior segment uveitis.

Adnan Tufail, Sue Lightman, Ahmed Kamal, Uwe Pleyer, Nuria María Gajate Paniagua, Corrine Dot, Xiao-Yan Li, Jenny Jiao, Jean Lou, Yehia Hashad and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Guidelines nr. 24a intermediate uveitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK, adnan.tufail@moorfields.nhs.uk.
Sue LightmanMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK, adnan.tufail@moorfields.nhs.uk.
Ahmed KamalAintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Uwe PleyerUniversity Eye Hospital, Uveitis Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt University Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Nuria María Gajate PaniaguaUniversity Hospital of Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Corrine DotDepartment of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, Lyon, France.
Xiao-Yan LiAllergan Plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jenny JiaoAllergan Plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jean LouAllergan Plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yehia HashadAllergan Plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
CONSTANCE Study Group
Allergan (Ireland) · IEMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBCal Poly Humboldt · USMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBService de Santé des Armées · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the long-term safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in patients treated for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or noninfectious posterior segment uveitis (NIPSU) in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND

methodsMulticenter (102 sites in France, Germany, Spain, UK), prospective, observational, post-authorization safety study in adult patients treated with DEX. Data collected up to 2 years after enrollment included serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESIs; adverse drug reactions that are considered important risks associated with DEX and listed in the European Union Ozurdex Risk Management Plan).

resultsOverall, 803 patients (652 RVO, 151 NIPSU) received on-study DEX treatment, and 73.1% completed 24 months of follow-up; 72.6% were DEX-naïve. Median number of on-study injections per treated eye was 2 (range, 1-7); median reinjection interval was 27.1 weeks. Nonocular SAEs affected 9.5% of patients; none were considered DEX-related. Ocular SAEs (most common: cataract progression) occurred in 3.2% of treated eyes. SAEs were similar in eyes stratified by previous DEX use and number of on-study DEX injections (≤2 or >2), in both RVO and NIPSU. The most common AESIs were cataract formation and progression (20.0% and 19.2% of treated phakic eyes, n=551), increased intraocular pressure (19.0% of treated eyes), and vitreous hemorrhage (3.3% of treated eyes). Cataract progression was more frequent in baseline phakic eyes that were previously treated with DEX or received >2 on-study DEX injections.

conclusionThe long-term safety profile of DEX was acceptable. No new safety concerns were identified.

Indexed as

corticosteroiddexamethasonedrug delivery deviceretinal vein occlusionsafety profileuveitis

Identifiers

PMID30584271
PMCPMC6287662
OpenAlexW2903515602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.