Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30584188›Full record

ArticleMicrobes and environments2019

Impact of Introduction of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on the Root Microbial Community in Agricultural Fields.

Turgut Yigit Akyol, Rieko Niwa, Hideki Hirakawa, Hayato Maruyama, Takumi Sato, Takae Suzuki, Ayako Fukunaga, Takashi Sato, Shigenobu Yoshida, Keitaro Tawaraya and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbes and environments, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Biocontrol ofMycobiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Turgut Yigit AkyolGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University.
Rieko NiwaCentral Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO).
Hideki HirakawaKazusa DNA Research Institute.
Hayato MaruyamaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University.
Takumi SatoFaculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University.
Takae SuzukiField Science Center, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tohoku University.
Ayako FukunagaWestern Region Agricultural Research Center, NARO.
Takashi SatoFaculty of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural University.
Shigenobu YoshidaCentral Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO).
Keitaro TawarayaFaculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University.
Masanori SaitoField Science Center, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tohoku University.
Tatsuhiro EzawaGraduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University.
Shusei SatoGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University.
Tohoku University · JPYamagata University · JPHokkaido University · JPCentral Region Agricultural Research Center · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPKazusa DNA Research Institute · JPNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPWestern Region Agricultural Research Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are important members of the root microbiome and may be used as biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. To elucidate the impact of AM fungal inoculation on indigenous root microbial communities, we used high-throughput sequencing and an analytical pipeline providing fixed operational taxonomic units (OTUs) as an output to investigate the bacterial and fungal communities of roots treated with a commercial AM fungal inoculum in six agricultural fields. AM fungal inoculation significantly influenced the root microbial community structure in all fields. Inoculation changed the abundance of indigenous AM fungi and other fungal members in a field-dependent manner. Inoculation consistently enriched several bacterial OTUs by changing the abundance of indigenous bacteria and introducing new bacteria. Some inoculum-associated bacteria closely interacted with the introduced AM fungi, some of which belonged to the genera Burkholderia, Cellulomonas, Microbacterium, Sphingomonas, and Streptomyces and may be candidate mycorrhizospheric bacteria that contribute to the establishment and/or function of the introduced AM fungi. Inoculated AM fungi also co-occurred with several indigenous bacteria with putative beneficial traits, suggesting that inoculated AM fungi may recruit specific taxa to confer better plant performance. The bacterial families Methylobacteriaceae, Acetobacteraceae, Armatimonadaceae, and Alicyclobacillaceae were consistently reduced by the inoculation, possibly due to changes in the host plant status caused by the inoculum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study to investigate interactions between AM fungal inoculation and indigenous root microbial communities in agricultural fields.

Indexed as

AgricultureMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaFungiMycorrhizaeOnionsPhosphorusPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSymbiosisPhosphorusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilhigh-throughput community analysismicrobiome manipulationnetwork analysisroot microbiomesustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID30584188
PMCPMC6440726
OpenAlexW2905778594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.