ArticleSleep medicine2020
Flow limitation/obstruction with recovery breath (FLOW) event for improved scoring of mild obstructive sleep apnea without electroencephalography.
Article in Sleep medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified scoring criteria to improve the accuracy of the home sleep apnea test.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Serendipity.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveApnea/hypopnea index (AHI), especially without arousal criteria, does not adequately risk stratify patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We describe and test scoring reliability of an event, Flow Limitation/Obstruction With recovery breath (FLOW), representing obstructive airflow disruptions using only pressure transducer and snore signals available without electroencephalography.
methodsThe following process was used (i) Development of FLOW event definition, (ii) Training period and definition refinement, and (iii) Reliability testing on 10 100-epoch polysomnography (PSG) samples and two 100-sample tests. Twenty full-night in-laboratory baseline PSGs in OSA patients with AHI with ≥4% desaturations <15 were rescored for FLOW events, traditional hypopneas with desaturations, respiratory-related arousal (RRA) events (hypopneas with arousals and respiratory-effort related arousals) and non-respiratory arousals (NRA).
resultsScoring of FLOW events in 100-epoch samples had good reliability with intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.91. The overall kappa for presence of events on two sets of 100 sample events was 0.84 and 0.87 demonstrating good agreement. Moreover, 80% of RRA and 8% of NRA were concurrent with FLOW events. Furthermore, 56% of FLOW events were independent of RRA events. FLOW stratifies patients in traditional AHI categories with 50%/8% of AHI with ≥3% desaturations (AHI3) <5 and 12%/63% of AHI3 >5 in lowest/highest tertiles of AHI3 plus FLOW index.
conclusionsScoring of FLOW after training is reliable. FLOW scores a high proportion of RRA and many currently unrepresented obstructive airflow disruptions. FLOW allows for stratification within the current normal-mild OSA category, which may better identify patients who will benefit from treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.