Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583738›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2018

Molecular tools and genetic markers for the generation of transgenic sexing strains in Anopheline mosquitoes.

Federica Bernardini, Roya Elaine Haghighat-Khah, Roberto Galizi, Andrew Marc Hammond, Tony Nolan, Andrea Crisanti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federica BernardiniDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Roya Elaine Haghighat-KhahDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Roberto GaliziDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Andrew Marc HammondDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Tony NolanDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Andrea CrisantiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. a.drcrisanti@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is a serious global health burden, affecting more than 200 million people each year in over 90 countries, predominantly in Africa, Asia and the Americas. Since the year 2000, a concerted effort to combat malaria has reduced its incidence by more than 40%, primarily due to the use of insecticide-treated bednets, indoor residual spraying and artemisinin-based combination drug therapies. Nevertheless, the cost of control is expected to nearly triple over the next decade and the current downward trend in disease transmission is threatened by the rise of resistance to drugs and insecticides. Novel strategies that are sustainable and cost-effective are needed to help usher in an era of malaria elimination. The most effective strategies thus far have focussed on control of the mosquito vector. The sterile insect technique (SIT) is a potentially powerful strategy that aims to suppress mosquito populations through the unproductive mating of wild female mosquitoes with sterile males that are released en masse. The technique and its derivatives are currently not appropriate for malaria control because it is difficult to sterilise males without compromising their ability to mate, and because anopheline males cannot be easily separated from females, which if released, could contribute to disease transmission. Advances in genome sequencing technologies and the development of transgenic techniques provide the tools necessary to produce mosquito sexing strains, which promise to improve current malaria-control programs and pave the way for new ones. In this review, the progress made in the development of transgenic sexing strains for the control of Anopheles gambiae, a major vector of human malaria, is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesFemaleGenetic EngineeringGenetic MarkersHumansInfertility, MaleMalariaMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsSex Determination ProcessesGenetic MarkersAnopheles mosquitoesgenetic engineeringMalariasex determinationvector control

Identifiers

PMID30583738
PMCPMC6304780
OpenAlexW2906675738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.