Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583720›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2018

A perspective on the need and current status of efficient sex separation methods for mosquito genetic control.

Philippos Aris Papathanos, Kostas Bourtzis, Frederic Tripet, Hervé Bossin, Jair Fernandes Virginio, Margareth Lara Capurro, Michelle Cristine Pedrosa, Amadou Guindo, Lakamy Sylla, Mamadou B Coulibaly and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Age-dependent mating dynamics, body size, and sex ratio in colonisedCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Insects · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Philippos Aris PapathanosDepartment of Entomology, The Robert H Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. p.papathanos@mail.huji.ac.il.
Kostas BourtzisInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria.
Frederic TripetCentre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Hervé BossinLaboratoire d'Entomologie Médicale, Institut Louis Malardé, BP 30, 98713, Papeete, French Polynesia.
Jair Fernandes VirginioBiofabrica Moscamed Brazil, Industrial District, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil.
Margareth Lara CapurroDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Michelle Cristine PedrosaBiofabrica Moscamed Brazil, Industrial District, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil.
Amadou GuindoMalaria Research and Training Center, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Point G, Bamako, BP: 1805, Mali.
Lakamy SyllaMalaria Research and Training Center, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Point G, Bamako, BP: 1805, Mali.
Mamadou B CoulibalyMalaria Research and Training Center, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Point G, Bamako, BP: 1805, Mali.
Franck Adama YaoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Patric Stephane EpopaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Abdoulaye DiabateInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Centre Muraz, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako · MLInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFUniversidade de São Paulo · BRCentre Muraz · BFHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRInternational Atomic Energy Agency · ATKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major efforts are currently underway to develop novel, complementary methods to combat mosquito-borne diseases. Mosquito genetic control strategies (GCSs) have become an increasingly important area of research on account of their species-specificity, track record in targeting agricultural insect pests, and their environmentally non-polluting nature. A number of programs targeting Aedes and Anopheles mosquitoes, vectors of human arboviruses and malaria respectively, are currently being developed or deployed in many parts of the world. Operationally implementing these technologies on a large scale however, beyond proof-of-concept pilot programs, is hampered by the absence of adequate sex separation methods. Sex separation eliminates females in the laboratory from male mosquitoes prior to release. Despite the need for sex separation for the control of mosquitoes, there have been limited efforts in recent years in developing systems that are fit-for-purpose. In this special issue of Parasites and Vectors we report on the progress of the global Coordinated Research Program on "Exploring genetic, molecular, mechanical and behavioural methods for sex separation in mosquitoes" that is led by the Insect Pest Control Subprogramme of the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture with the specific aim of building efficient sex separation systems for mosquito species. In an effort to overcome current barriers we briefly highlight what we believe are the three main reasons why progress has been so slow in developing appropriate sex separation systems: the availability of methods that are not scalable, the difficulty of building the ideal genetic systems and, finally, the lack of research efforts in this area.

Indexed as

Mosquito ControlAedesAnimalsAnophelesFemaleGene Drive TechnologyHumansInfertilityMalariaMaleMosquito VectorsSex Determination AnalysisGene driveGenetic controlGenetic sexing strainsMosquitoSexingSex separationSterile insect technique

Identifiers

PMID30583720
PMCPMC6304774
OpenAlexW2905744469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.