Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583611›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2018

Epibatidine: A Promising Natural Alkaloid in Health.

Bahare Salehi, Simona Sestito, Simona Rapposelli, Gregorio Peron, Daniela Calina, Mehdi Sharifi-Rad, Farukh Sharopov, Natália Martins, Javad Sharifi-Rad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The pyridazine heterocycle in molecular recognition and drug discovery.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Bahare SalehiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam 44340847, Iran. bahar.salehi007@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-9797
Simona SestitoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy. simona.sestito@for.unipi.it.
Simona RapposelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy. simona.rapposelli@unipi.it.
Gregorio PeronDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Via Francesco Marzolo, 5, 35131 Padova (PD), Italy. gregorio.peron@ub.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-6184
Daniela CalinaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova 200349, Romania. calinadaniela@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-9116
Mehdi Sharifi-RadDepartment of Medical Parasitology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol 61663-335, Iran. mehdi_sharifirad@yahoo.com.
Farukh SharopovDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Rudaki 139, Dushanbe 734003, Tajikistan. shfarukh@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-8887
Natália MartinsFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. ncmartins@med.up.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-5201
Javad Sharifi-RadZabol Medicinal Plants Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol 61615-585, Iran. javad.sharifirad@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7301-8151
University of Pisa · ITZabol University of Medical Sciences · IRBam University of Medical Sciences · IRTajik State Medical University · TJUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epibatidine is a natural alkaloid that acts at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). The present review aims to carefully discuss the affinity of epibatidine and its synthetic derivatives, analogues to nAChRs for α4β2 subtype, pharmacokinetic parameters, and its role in health. Published literature shows a low affinity and lack of binding of epibatidine and its synthetic analogues to plasma proteins, indicating their availability for metabolism. Because of its high toxicity, the therapeutic use of epibatidine is hampered. However, new synthetic analogs endowed from this molecule have been developed, with a better therapeutic window and improved selectivity. All these aspects are also discussed here. On the other hand, many reports are devoted to structure⁻activity relationships to obtain optically active epibatidine and its analogues, and to access its pharmacological effects. Although pharmacological results are obtained from experimental studies and only a few clinical trials, new perspectives are open for the discovery of new drug therapies.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsAnalgesicsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemHumansIsoxazolesNeurodegenerative DiseasesPyridinesPyrrolidinesQuantum TheoryReceptors, Nicotinic3-methyl-5-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)isoxazoleAlkaloidsAnalgesicsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemepibatidineIsoxazolesPyridinesPyrrolidinesReceptors, NicotinicABT-418ABT-594analgesicsepibatidinenicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Identifiers

PMID30583611
PMCPMC6359223
OpenAlexW2906609434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.