ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Emerging Trends and New Developments in Disaster Research after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health-Related Rehabilitation after the 2008 Great Wenchuan Earthquake in China: A Ten Year Retrospective Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Structured Disaster Management Training Program on Nurses' Disaster Readiness for Response to Emergencies and Disasters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of nursing management · 2024Trial
- Location based bursty event detection and information dissemination using influencers in Twitter.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Qualitative study on health self-management of patients with metabolic syndrome among bereaved population after earthquake.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evolution of Digital Health and Exploration of Patented Technologies (2017-2021): Bibliometric Analysis.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Research on the Natural Hazard Emergency Cooperation Behavior between Governments and Social Organizations Based on the Hybrid Mechanism of Incentive and Linkage in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Study on the Mechanism and Strategy of Cross-Regional Emergency Cooperation for Natural Disasters in China-Based on the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A study on the relationships of place attachment and individual attributes of residents in different vulnerable districts in Taipei, Taiwan.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Institutional Review Board Preparedness for Disaster Research: a Practical Approach.Current environmental health reports · 2021Review
- Current State and Future Directions of Intranasal Delivery Route for Central Nervous System Disorders: A Scientometric and Visualization Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2020Article
- The building of social resilience in Sichuan after the Wenchuan earthquake: A perspective of the socio-government interactions.Safety science · 2020Article
- Public perception and attitudes to disaster risks in a coastal metropolis of Saudi Arabia.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2020Article
- A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Research on Parkinson's Disease Associated With Pesticide Exposure.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal Pollution: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis from 1989 to 2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On the tenth anniversary of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, investigating the evolution of disaster science is worthwhile and can be used to improve the future execution of disaster risk management. Based on more than 55,786 articles on the relative topic of "Disaster" derived from the Web of Science Core Collection from 1999⁻2017, this study employs CiteSpace and Google Earth to identify and visualize the spatial distribution of publications, bursts of keywords and categories, highly cited references, and interdisciplinary levels and then identify the emerging trends of disaster research over the past 20 years. The results show that the earthquake indeed jumpstarted a massive wave of disaster research around the world and increased international cooperation over the last decade. However, in terms of both the quantity and quality of publications in disaster research fields, China is lagging behind the U.S. and European countries. Moreover, although designing disaster prevention and mitigation strategies is a new popular field of disaster science, geological environment changes and geologic hazards triggered by earthquakes are more popular research topics than disaster emergency and recovery. In addition, the transdisciplinary level of disaster science increased after the earthquake. This interdisciplinary characteristic of disaster science gradually increased in popularity, which demonstrates that people can learn from catastrophes. These emerging trends could serve as a scientific basis to clearly understand disaster science progress over the last 20 years and provide a reference for rapidly identifying frontier issues in disaster science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.