Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583560›Full record

ArticleCells2018

Differential Mechanisms of Cell Death Induced by HDAC Inhibitor SAHA and MDM2 Inhibitor RG7388 in MCF-7 Cells.

Umamaheswari Natarajan, Thiagarajan Venkatesan, Vijayaraghavan Radhakrishnan, Shila Samuel, Appu Rathinavelu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Selectively enhancing radiosensitivity of cancer cellsActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Umamaheswari NatarajanVRR Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Kattupakkam, Chennai 600056, India. un15@mynsu.nova.edu.
Thiagarajan VenkatesanRumbaugh-Goodwin Institute for Cancer Research, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. tvenkatesan@nova.edu.
Vijayaraghavan RadhakrishnanVRR Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Kattupakkam, Chennai 600056, India. drrvijayaraghavan@gmail.com.
Shila SamuelVRR Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Kattupakkam, Chennai 600056, India. vrribms@gmail.com.
Appu RathinaveluRumbaugh-Goodwin Institute for Cancer Research, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. appu@nova.edu.
Nova Southeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression is often altered by epigenetic modifications that can significantly influence the growth ability and progression of cancers. SAHA (Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, also known as Vorinostat), a well-known Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, can stop cancer growth and metastatic processes through epigenetic alterations. On the other hand, Letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor that can elicit strong anti-cancer effects on breast cancer through direct and indirect mechanisms. A newly developed inhibitor, RG7388 specific for an oncogene-derived protein called MDM2, is in clinical trials for the treatment of various cancers. In this paper, we performed assays to measure the effects of cell cycle arrest resulting from individual drug treatments or combination treatments with SAHA + letrozole and SAHA + RG7388, using the MCF-7 breast cancer cells. When SAHA was used individually, or in combination treatments with RG7388, a significant increase in the cytotoxic effect was obtained. Induction of cell cycle arrest by SAHA in cancer cells was evidenced by elevated p21 protein levels. In addition, SAHA treatment in MCF-7 cells showed significant up-regulation in phospho-RIP3 and MLKL levels. Our results confirmed that cell death caused by SAHA treatment was primarily through the induction of necroptosis. On the other hand, the RG7388 treatment was able to induce apoptosis by elevating BAX levels. It appears that, during combination treatments, with SAHA and RG7388, two parallel pathways might be induced simultaneously, that could lead to increased cancer cell death. SAHA appears to induce cell necroptosis in a p21-dependent manner, and RG7388 seems to induce apoptosis in a p21-independent manner, outlining differential mechanisms of cell death induction. However, further studies are needed to fully understand the intracellular mechanisms that are triggered by these two anti-cancer agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisbcl-2-Associated X ProteinCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DeathCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21FemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansLetrozoleMCF-7 Cellspara-AminobenzoatesProtein KinasesPyrrolidinesReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsBAX protein, humanbcl-2-Associated X ProteinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsLetrozoleMLKL protein, humanpara-AminobenzoatesProtein KinasesPyrrolidinesReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRG7388RIPK3 protein, humanVorinostatapoptosisMCF-7MLKLnecroptosisp21phospho-RIP3RG7388SAHA

Identifiers

PMID30583560
PMCPMC6356663
OpenAlexW2906541310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.