ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Content-Aware Focal Plane Selection and Proposals for Object Tracking on Plenoptic Image Sequences.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAVA: Region-Based Average Video Quality Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multi-focus Image Fusion for Confocal Microscopy Using U-Net Regression Map.Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition · 2021Article
- High-Accuracy Correction of a Microlens Array for Plenoptic Imaging Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object tracking is a fundamental problem in computer vision since it is required in many practical applications including video-based surveillance and autonomous vehicles. One of the most challenging scenarios in the problem is when the target object is partially or even fully occluded by other objects. In such cases, most of existing trackers can fail in their task while the object is invisible. Recently, a few techniques have been proposed to tackle the occlusion problem by performing the tracking on plenoptic image sequences. Although they have shown promising results based on the refocusing capability of plenoptic images, there is still room for improvement. In this paper, we propose a novel focus index selection algorithm to identify an optimal focal plane where the tracking should be performed. To determine an optimal focus index, we use a focus measure to find maximally focused plane and a visual similarity to capture the plane where the target object is visible, and its appearance is distinguishably clear. We further use the selected focus index to generate proposals. Since the optimal focus index allows us to estimate the distance between the camera and the target object, we can more accurately guess the scale changes of the object in the image plane. Our proposal algorithm also takes the trajectory of the target object into account. We extensively evaluate our proposed techniques on three plenoptic image sequences by comparing them against the prior tracking methods specialized to the plenoptic image sequences. In experiments, our method provides higher accuracy and robustness over the prior art, and those results confirm that the merits of our proposed algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.