Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583519›Full record

ReviewCancers2018

Induction Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Question of Belief.

Andy Karabajakian, Max Gau, Thibault Reverdy, Eve-Marie Neidhardt, Jérôme Fayette

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andy KarabajakianRhône-Alpes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France. andy.karabajakian@gmail.com.
Max GauRhône-Alpes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France. Max.gau@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Thibault ReverdyRhône-Alpes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France. Thibault.Reverdy@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Eve-Marie NeidhardtRhône-Alpes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France. eve.marie.neidhardt@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Jérôme FayetteRhône-Alpes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France. jerome.fayette@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Centre Léon Bérard · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) has been used for decades. However, its role is yet to be clearly defined outside of larynx preservation. Patients with high risk of distant failure might potentially benefit from sequential treatment. It is now widely accepted that TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) is the standard IC regimen. Essays that have compared this approach with the standard of care, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), are mostly inconclusive. Radiotherapy (RT) can be used in the post-IC setting and be sensitized by chemotherapy or cetuximab. Again, no consensus exists but there seems to be trend in favor of potentiation by cisplatin. Less toxic schemes of IC are tested as toxicity is a major issue with TPF. IC might have an interesting role in human papilloma virus (HPV)-related LA HNSCC and lead to CCRT de-escalation.

Indexed as

controversialde-escalationhigh-riskinconclusiveinductionlarynx preservationtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID30583519
PMCPMC6357133
OpenAlexW2906096025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.