Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30583471›Full record

ArticleCancers2018

A New Patient-Derived Metastatic Glioblastoma Cell Line: Characterisation and Response to Sodium Selenite Anticancer Agent.

Sylvie Berthier, Louis Larrouquère, Pierre Champelovier, Edwige Col, Christine Lefebvre, Cécile Cottet-Rouselle, Josiane Arnaud, Catherine Garrel, François Laporte, Jean Boutonnat and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvie BerthierCytometry Platform, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. SBerthier@chu-grenoble.fr.
Louis LarrouquèreBrainTech Lab, INSERM U1205, 38000 Grenoble, France. LLarrouquere@chu-grenoble.fr.
Pierre ChampelovierCytometry Platform, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. pierre.champelovier@wanadoo.fr.
Edwige ColUnit of Anatomopathology, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. ECol@chu-grenoble.fr.
Christine LefebvreLaboratory of Hematology, Onco-Genetic and Immunology, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. CLefebvre@chu-grenoble.fr.
Cécile Cottet-RouselleLaboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA) and SFR BEeSy, University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm U1055, 38000 Grenoble, France. cecile.cottet@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Josiane ArnaudLaboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics (LBFA) and SFR BEeSy, University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm U1055, 38000 Grenoble, France. JArnaud@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9101-3330
Catherine GarrelUnit Nutritional and Hormonal Biochemistry, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. CGarrel@chu-grenoble.fr.
François LaporteUnit Nutritional and Hormonal Biochemistry, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. francois.laporte@cegetel.net.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-8973
Jean BoutonnatUnit of Anatomopathology, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. JBoutonnat@chu-grenoble.fr.
Patrice FaureUnit Nutritional and Hormonal Biochemistry, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. PFaure@chu-grenoble.fr.
Florence Hazane-PuchUnit Nutritional and Hormonal Biochemistry, Institute of Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes Hospital, CS10217, 38043 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France. FPuch@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-289X
Inserm · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

GEFLUC Jan2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) tumors are very heterogeneous, organized in a hierarchical pattern, including cancer stem cells (CSC), and are responsible for development, maintenance, and cancer relapse. Therefore, it is relevant to establish new GBM cell lines with CSC characteristics to develop new treatments. A new human GBM cell line, named R2J, was established from the cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) of a patient affected by GBM with leptomeningeal metastasis. R2J cells exhibits an abnormal karyotype and form self-renewable spheres in a serum-free medium. Original tumor, R2J, cultured in monolayer (2D) and in spheres showed a persistence expression of CD44, CD56 (except in monolayer), EGFR, Ki67, Nestin, and vimentin. The R2J cell line is tumorigenic and possesses CSC properties. We tested in vitro the anticancer effects of sodium selenite (SS) compared to temozolomide TMZ. SS was absorbed by R2J cells, was cytotoxic, induced an oxidative stress, and arrested cell growth in G2M before inducing both necrosis and apoptosis via caspase-3. SS also modified dimethyl-histone-3-lysine-9 (H3K9m2) levels and decreased histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, suggesting anti-invasiveness potential. This study highlights the value of this new GBM cell line for preclinical modeling of clinically relevant, patient specific GBM and opens a therapeutic window to test SS to target resistant and recurrent GBM.

Indexed as

cancer stem cellscell deathepigeneticsGlioblastomanew cell linesodium selenitexenograft

Identifiers

PMID30583471
PMCPMC6356827
OpenAlexW2906024157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.