Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30582954›Full record

ReviewFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2019

Finding the bad actor: Challenges in identifying toxic constituents in botanical dietary supplements.

Georgia K Roberts, Dale Gardner, Paul M Foster, Paul C Howard, Edmund Lui, Larry Walker, Richard B van Breemen, Scott S Auerbach, Cynthia Rider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Phytochemicals against TNFα-Mediated Neuroinflammatory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Evaluating Sufficient Similarity of Botanical Dietary Supplements: Combining Chemical and In Vitro Biological Data.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Naturally complex: Perspectives and challenges associated with Botanical Dietary Supplement Safety assessment.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Georgia K RobertsDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Electronic address: georgia.roberts@nih.gov.
Dale GardnerU.S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, UT, USA.
Paul M FosterDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Paul C HowardNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Edmund LuiSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Larry WalkerNational Center for Natural Products Research, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Richard B van BreemenOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Scott S AuerbachDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Cynthia RiderDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

Toxicological Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2016 to 2019
$31.9M
Toxicological Assessments for the Division of the National Toxicology ProgramZICES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2020 to 2021
$18.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC ES103316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botanical-derived dietary supplements have widespread use in the general population. The complex and variable nature of botanical ingredients and reports of adverse responses have led to concern for negative human health impacts following consumption of these products. Toxicity testing of the vast number of available products, formulations, and combinations is not feasible due to the time and resource intensive nature of comprehensive testing. Methods are needed to assess the safety of a large number of products via more efficient frameworks. Identification of toxicologically-active constituents is one approach being used, with many advantages toward product regulation. Bioassay-guided fractionation (BGF) is the leading approach used to identify biologically-active constituents. Most BGF studies with botanicals focus on identifying pharmacologically-active constituents for drug discovery or botanical efficacy research. Here, we explore BGF in a toxicological context, drawing from both efficacy and poisonous plant research. Limitations of BGF, including loss of mixture activity and bias toward abundant constituents, and recent advancements in the field (e.g., biochemometrics) are discussed from a toxicological perspective. Identification of active constituents will allow better monitoring of market products for known toxicologically-active constituents, as well as surveying human exposure, two important steps to ensuring the safety of botanical dietary supplements.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayDietary SupplementsFood ContaminationHumansMetabolomicsPlant PreparationsPlant PreparationsActive constituentsBioassay guided fractionationDietary supplement

Identifiers

PMID30582954
PMCPMC12239984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.