ArticleProteins2019
Rigidity and flexibility characteristics of DD[E/D]-transposases Mos1 and Sleeping Beauty.
Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA binding and transposition activity of the Sleeping Beauty transposase: role of structural stability of the primary DNA-binding domain.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- A novel hyperactive variant of theMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
- Characterization of Inducible HSP70 Genes in an Antarctic Yeast,Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DD[E/D]-transposases catalyze the multistep reaction of cut-and-paste DNA transposition. Structurally, several DD[E/D]-transposases have been characterized, revealing a multi-domain structure with the catalytic domain possessing the RNase H-like structural motif that brings three catalytic residues (D, D, and E or D) into close proximity for the catalysis. However, the dynamic behavior of DD[E/D]-transposases during transposition remains poorly understood. Here, we analyze the rigidity and flexibility characteristics of two representative DD[E/D]-transposases Mos1 and Sleeping Beauty (SB) using the minimal distance constraint model (mDCM). We find that the catalytic domain of both transposases is globally rigid, with the notable exception of the clamp loop being flexible in the DNA-unbound form. Within this globally rigid structure, the central β-sheet of the RNase H-like motif is much less rigid in comparison to its surrounding α-helices, forming a cage-like structure. The comparison of the original SB transposase to its hyperactive version SB100X reveals the region where the change in flexibility/rigidity correlates with increased activity. This region is found to be within the RNase H-like structural motif and comprise the loop leading from beta-strand B3 to helix H1, helices H1 and H2, which are located on the same side of the central beta-sheet, and the loop between helix H3 and beta-strand B5. We further identify the RKEN214-217DAVQ mutations of the set of hyperactive mutations within the catalytic domain of SB transposase to be the driving factor that induces change in residue-pair rigidity correlations within SB transposase. Given that a signature RNase H-like structural motif is found in DD[E/D]-transposases and, more broadly, in a large superfamily of polynucleotidyl transferases, our results are relevant to these proteins as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.