ReviewJoints2018
New Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of National Surveys of the Last 5 Years.
Review in Joints, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05931627 (The Implications of Tourniquet Use on Early Quadriceps Function in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Implications of Tourniquet Use on Early Quadriceps Function in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2023Pooled it
- Reduced knee laxity and failure rate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with repair for acute tears: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023Pooled it
- Trauma and femoral tunnel position are the most common failure modes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020Pooled it
- Non-detached hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrates comparable outcomes to the traditional detached hamstring tendon technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Influence of Intra-Articular Tunnel Aperture Morphology on Clinical Outcomes and Graft Rerupture After ACL Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Nationwide Trends in Arthroscopic Knee Surgery and ACL Reconstruction in Romania, 2017-2023: Insights from a Seven-Year Health System Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- "Returning to Sport Is Not Just About the Knee": Physiotherapists' Experiences of the Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HT) in patients aged 50 or older.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Surgical preferences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross-sectional study in a low-middle income country.PloS one · 2025Article
- Radiographic acceptable zone of endobutton placement in ACL reconstruction: A prospective study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques and Postoperative Care Among Leaders in the Field: A Survey of the Herodicus Society.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Muscle Morphology Does Not Solely Determine Knee Flexion Weakness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Combined Experimental and Computational Modeling Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Article
- 3D visualization of the human anterior cruciate ligament combining micro-CT and histological analysis.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
- Effect of anteromedial portal location on femoral tunnel inclination, length, and location in hamstring autograft-based single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.Knee surgery & related research · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a historical view.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Knee flexor strength and symmetry vary by device, body position and angle of assessment following ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts at long-term follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: unravelling the role of time between injury and surgery, time since reconstruction, age, gender, pain, graft type, and concomitant injuries.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Re-rupture rate and the post-surgical meniscal injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique in comparison to the interference screw technique: a retrospective analysis of 200 patients with at least 3 years follow-up.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- GLI1 Deficiency Impairs the Tendon-Bone Healing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: In Vivo Study UsingJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze national surveys of orthopaedic surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to determine their preferences related to the preferred graft, femoral tunnel positioning, fixation and tensioning methods, antibiotic and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, and use of tourniquet and drains. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed. Inclusion criteria were surveys of ACL reconstruction trends and preferences published in the past 5 years (2011-2016), involving members of national societies of orthopaedics. Information regarding survey modalities, population surveyed, graft choice both in the general or in the athletic population, surgical technique, fixation, use of antibiotic, tourniquet, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis was extracted. Eight national surveys were included from Europe (three), North or Latin America (three), and Asia (two). Overall, 7,420 questionnaires were sent, and 1,495 participants completed the survey (response rate ranging from 16 to 76.6%). All surveys reported the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft as the preferred graft, ranging from 45 to 89% of the surveyed population, followed by bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft (2-41%) and allograft (2-17%). Only two surveys focusing on graft choice in athletic population underlined how in high-demand sportive population the graft choices changes in favor of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction was the preferred surgical technique in the four surveys that investigated this issue. Five surveys were in favor of anteromedial (AM) portal and two in favor of trans-tibial technique. Suspension devices for femoral fixation were the preferred choice in all but one survey, while interference screws were the preferred method for tibial fixation. The two surveys that investigated graft tensioning were in favor of manual tensioning. The use of tourniquet, antibiotics, drains, and anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis were vaguely reported. A trend toward the preference of HT autograft was registered in all the surveys; however, sport participation has been highlighted as an important variable for increased use of BPTB. Single-bundle reconstruction with AM portal technique and suspension femoral fixation and screws fixation for the tibia seem the preferred solution. Other variables such as tensioning, antibiotic, anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis, tourniquet use, and drains were investigated scarcely among the surveys; therefore, no clear trends could be delineated. This is a Level V, systematic review of expert opinion study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.