Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30582018›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

Clinical application of Total Skin Electron Beam (TSEB) therapy for the management of T cell cutaneous lymphomas. The evolving role of low dose (12 Gy) treatment schedule.

Ioannis Georgakopoulos, Evaggelia Papadavid, Kalliopi Platoni, Maria Dilvoi, George Patatoukas, Efrosyni Kypraiou, Vasiliki Nikolaou, Efstathios Efstathopoulos, Nikolaos Kelekis, Vasilios Kouloulias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Total skin electron beam therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ultra-Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Palliation of Mycosis Fungoides.Case reports in dermatological medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ioannis GeorgakopoulosNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Evaggelia PapadavidNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dermatology Clinic, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Kalliopi PlatoniNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Medical Physics Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Maria DilvoiNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Medical Physics Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
George PatatoukasNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Medical Physics Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Efrosyni KypraiouNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Vasiliki NikolaouNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 1st Dermatology Clinic, Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Efstathios EfstathopoulosNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Medical Physics Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos KelekisNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Vasilios KoulouliasNational Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Although rare, cutaneous lymphomas represent a separate entity in hematologic oncology. T cell origin lymphomas are most common, with Mycosis Fungoides (MF) accounting for about 50-70% of cases. Sezary Syndrome (SS), which represents the leukemic varian of MF, accounts for 3% of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas (CTCL). Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy (TSEB) is included at the mainstream of treatment choices for CTCL. The scope of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of two treatment schedules of TSEB. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We report our experience with TSEB in the management of MF and SS, as of 14 patients treated in our institution from 2011 to 2015. 8 patients received the 12 Gy (low dose) scheme while 6 patients were managed with 36 Gy (standard or full dose scheme) according to six dual field Stanford technique. The endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response and toxicity of treatment.

resultsAfter a median follow up of 2.5 years we noted excellent treatment outcome, with both schemes being well tolerated and resulting in comparable response rates. The overall response rate for both treatment regimens was over 87.5%. Treatment was well tolerated with mild toxicity.

conclusionThe role of TSEB in the management of MF and SS is well established. The low dose TSEB schedule of 12 Gy is an effective treatment option, since therapeutic results are more than acceptable, compliance is excellent and toxicity is minimal. Moreover, the evidence that it can be repeated safely makes it more attractive than the standard 36 Gy scheme, when a patient is referred to radiation treatment according to treatment guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID30582018
PMCPMC6293019
OpenAlexW2904238342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.