Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581766›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2019

Cannabis acute use impacts symptoms and functionality in a cohort of antipsychotic naïve First Episode of Psychosis individuals.

Luccas S Coutinho, Hianna Honorato, Cinthia H Higuchi, Daniel A Cavalcante, Sintia Belangeiro, Mariane Noto, Rodrigo A Bressan, Quirino Cordeiro, Cristiano Noto, Ary Gadelha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The relationship between substance use and self-reported aspects of social functioning in patients with a psychotic disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luccas S CoutinhoInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Hianna HonoratoInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Cinthia H HiguchiInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Daniel A CavalcanteInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Sintia BelangeiroInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Mariane NotoInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Rodrigo A BressanInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Quirino CordeiroDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiano NotoInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Ary GadelhaInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Clinical Neuroscience (LiNC), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCannabis use increases the risk of developing psychosis, and subjects with psychosis are more likely to use cannabis. However, studies on the influence of cannabis on psychotic dimensions, response to treatment, and functional outcomes showed conflicting results. Such heterogeneity may be due the inclusion of patients who were already under treatment, and lack of specificity in evaluations. We investigated whether cannabis use yields distinct symptom profiles and functionality in a cohort of antipsychotic-naïve patients at first episode of psychosis (FEP).

methodsThis research is part of a prospective cohort study performed in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The baseline assessment was completed by 175 individuals, and 99 of them were reassessed in a ten-week follow up. We investigated the relationship between cannabis exposure variables (acute use, lifetime use and age at first use) and outcomes: symptom dimensions and functioning.

resultsIndividuals who reported acute use of cannabis had higher excitement symptoms at baseline, higher excitement and positive response rates, but no significant differences at follow-up. Additionally, more days of cannabis use in the last month predicted worse functionality and clinical impression at baseline but not at follow-up. DISCUSSION: The acute use of cannabis influenced the clinical presentation at our FEP baseline assessment, but did not to influence symptoms or functional outcomes at 10-week follow-up. Additionally, acute cannabis users had a better response for excitement and positive symptoms. Higher excitement symptoms at presentation of FEP should raise concerns of possible acute use of cannabis. Longer follow-up times may elucidate whether the effects on functionality would be more evident later in disease development.

Identifiers

PMID30581766
PMCPMC6293028
OpenAlexW2904713403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.