Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581671›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Freshwater carbon and nutrient cycles revealed through reconstructed population genomes.

Alexandra M Linz, Shaomei He, Sarah L R Stevens, Karthik Anantharaman, Robin R Rohwer, Rex R Malmstrom, Stefan Bertilsson, Katherine D McMahon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome editing in ubiquitous freshwater Actinobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra M LinzDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-4810
Shaomei HeDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarah L R StevensDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7040-548X
Karthik AnantharamanDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Robin R RohwerEnvironmental Chemistry and Technology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-6489
Rex R MalmstromDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Stefan BertilssonDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Limnology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Katherine D McMahonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USJoint Genome Institute · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although microbes mediate much of the biogeochemical cycling in freshwater, the categories of carbon and nutrients currently used in models of freshwater biogeochemical cycling are too broad to be relevant on a microbial scale. One way to improve these models is to incorporate microbial data. Here, we analyze both genes and genomes from three metagenomic time series and propose specific roles for microbial taxa in freshwater biogeochemical cycles. Our metagenomic time series span multiple years and originate from a eutrophic lake (Lake Mendota) and a humic lake (Trout Bog Lake) with contrasting water chemistry. Our analysis highlights the role of polyamines in the nitrogen cycle, the diversity of diazotrophs between lake types, the balance of assimilatory vs. dissimilatory sulfate reduction in freshwater, the various associations between types of phototrophy and carbon fixation, and the density and diversity of glycoside hydrolases in freshwater microbes. We also investigated aspects of central metabolism such as hydrogen metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, methylotrophy, and sugar degradation. Finally, by analyzing the dynamics over time in nitrogen fixation genes and

Indexed as

Carbon cyclingFreshwaterMetabolismMicrobial communitiesNutrient cycling

Identifiers

PMID30581671
PMCPMC6292386
OpenAlexW2905186942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.