Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581604›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2018

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: General Overview.

Wei Lu, Yan Tong, Yue Yu, Yiqiao Xing, Changzheng Chen, Yin Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei LuEye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Eye Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0218-569X
Yan TongEye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Eye Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-2405
Yue YuHisee Medical Artificial Intelligent Lab, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9147-4644
Yiqiao XingEye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Eye Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5534-1951
Changzheng ChenEye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Eye Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-552X
Yin ShenEye Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Eye Institute of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-3948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of unmanned plane, autonomous vehicles, face recognition, and language processing, the artificial intelligence (AI) has remarkably revolutionized our lifestyle. Recent studies indicate that AI has astounding potential to perform much better than human beings in some tasks, especially in the image recognition field. As the amount of image data in imaging center of ophthalmology is increasing dramatically, analyzing and processing these data is in urgent need. AI has been tried to apply to decipher medical data and has made extraordinary progress in intelligent diagnosis. In this paper, we presented the basic workflow for building an AI model and systematically reviewed applications of AI in the diagnosis of eye diseases. Future work should focus on setting up systematic AI platforms to diagnose general eye diseases based on multimodal data in the real world.

Identifiers

PMID30581604
PMCPMC6276430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.