Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581369›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2018

Approach to Neonates and Young Infants with Fever without a Source Who Are at Risk for Severe Bacterial Infection.

Susanna Esposito, Victoria Elisa Rinaldi, Alberto Argentiero, Edoardo Farinelli, Marta Cofini, Renato D'Alonzo, Antonella Mencacci, Nicola Principi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aspects of triage for infants: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanna EspositoPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-2837
Victoria Elisa RinaldiPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alberto ArgentieroPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Edoardo FarinelliPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Marta CofiniPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Renato D'AlonzoPediatric Clinic, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Antonella MencacciMicrobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-6172
Nicola PrincipiPediatrics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong neonates and infants <3 months of age with fever without a source (FWS), 5% to 15% of cases are patients with fever caused by a serious bacterial infection (SBI). To favour the differentiation between low- and high-risk infants, several algorithms based on analytical and clinical parameters have been developed. The aim of this review is to describe the management of young infants with FWS and to discuss the impact of recent knowledge regarding FWS management on clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed was used to search for all of the studies published over the last 35 years using the keywords: "fever without source" or "fever of unknown origin" or "meningitis" or "sepsis" or "urinary tract infection" and "neonate" or "newborn" or "infant <90 days of life" or "infant <3 months". RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The selection of neonates and young infants who are <3 months old with FWS who are at risk for SBI remains a problem without a definitive solution. The old Rochester criteria remain effective for identifying young infants between 29 and 60 days old who do not have severe bacterial infections (SBIs). However, the addition of laboratory tests such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can significantly improve the identification of children with SBI. The approach in evaluating neonates is significantly more complicated, as their risk of SBIs, including bacteremia and meningitis, remains relevant and none of the suggested approaches can reduce the risk of dramatic mistakes. In both groups, the best antibiotic must be carefully selected considering the clinical findings, the laboratory data, the changing epidemiology, and increasing antibiotic resistance of the most common infectious bacteria.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBacteremiaBacterial InfectionsCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinFeverHumansInfantInfant, NewbornCalcitoninC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID30581369
PMCPMC6287153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.