Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30581354›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2018

The Effects of Education and Training Given to Phlebotomists for Reducing Preanalytical Errors.

Fatma Demet Arslan, Inanc Karakoyun, Banu Isbilen Basok, Merve Zeytinli Aksit, Esma Celik, Kemal Dogan, Can Duman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Glucose meters: What's the laboratory reference glucose?Journal of medical biochemistry · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatma Demet ArslanUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Inanc KarakoyunUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Banu Isbilen BasokUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Merve Zeytinli AksitUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Esma CelikUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Kemal DoganUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
Can DumanUniversity of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training & Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Department Yenisehir, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most common sources of error in the preanalytical phase are considered to be at the stage of patient preparation and sample collection. In order to reduce the preanalytical errors, we aimed to determine the level of phlebotomists knowledge about the preanalytic phase before and after planned trainings in the study.

methodsTraining about preanalytical processes was given to the 454 health professionals and the majority of them were employed as nurse. Questionnaires before and after training were conducted. In order to assess the effect of the training into the process, preanalytical error rates were calculated before and after training.

resultsThe total correct answer rates of vocational school of health diplomaed were statistically lower than the total correct answer rates of other. It was observed significantly increase in the rate of correct answers to questionnaire and significantly decrease in preanalytical error rates after training.

conclusionsThe results of the survey showed that the attitudes of the phlebotomists were diverse in the preanalytical processes according to the levels of education and their practices. By providing training to all staff on a regular basis, their information about preanalytical phase could be updated and hence, it may possible to significantly reduce the preanalytical errors in health practice and nursing science.

Indexed as

educationphlebotomypreanalytical errortraining

Identifiers

PMID30581354
PMCPMC6294099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.