ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Improving Community-Engaged Implementation Science: Perspectives From "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Award Cases in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Patient and Public Involvement in Malnutrition Disorders Health Research: A Methodological Systematic Review Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Building Research for Academic and Community Equity (BRACE): A Toolkit for Community Research Partnerships.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
- Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Collaborating with and enabling diverse communities to address health inequities: The experiences of a community engagement and outreach team.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Building trust in rural communities: recruitment and retention strategies in developmental science.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Identifying and addressing institutional barriers to community partner compensation for engaged research: A Clinical and Translational Science Award case study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Bridging the divide: barriers and facilitators to equitable community-academic partnerships in health research.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from theBMJ open · 2023Review
- Lab Meets World: the Case for Use-Inspired Basic Research in Affective Science.Affective science · 2023Review
- Effects of a Service-Learning Neuroscience Course on Mood and Intergroup Anxiety.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Integrating community voices in the research continuum: Perspectives on a consultation service.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input.Implementation science communications · 2022Review
- Engaging Families in Life Course Intervention Research: An Essential Step in Advancing Equity.Pediatrics · 2022Article
- Storytelling training to promote stakeholder engagement in research dissemination.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Family-focused obesity prevention program implementation in urban versus rural communities: a case study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Recruitment and Retention Strategies Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Web-Based Intervention Trials: Retrospective Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Exploring community engaged research experiences and preferences: a multi-level qualitative investigation.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEngaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders' perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research.
methodsA 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, and indicators of successful engagement) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions.
resultsOf the 109 respondents, 60% were racial/ethnic minorities and 78% were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57%) reported current involvement with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Only 25% viewed researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few (13%) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (P = .001).
conclusionsAppropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic-community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.