Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30580857›Full record

Trial reportIndian heart journal

Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy-Insights from an Indian study.

Sanjai Pattu Valappil, Sivaprasad Kunjukrishnapillai, Sunitha Viswanathan, Alummoottil George Koshy, Prabha Nini Gupta, Radhakrishnan Vallikkattu Velayudhan, Mathew Iype

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjai Pattu ValappilDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India. Electronic address: sanjaiinorion@gmail.com.
Sivaprasad KunjukrishnapillaiDepartment of Cardiology, T. D. Medical College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
Sunitha ViswanathanDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India.
Alummoottil George KoshyDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India.
Prabha Nini GuptaDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India.
Radhakrishnan Vallikkattu VelayudhanDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India.
Mathew IypeDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India.
Government Medical College · INT. D. Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study if four cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could offer protection against contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and post procedural renal dysfunction in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

methodsThis was a prospective single blind randomized sham controlled trial where patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stage III chronic kidney disease were randomized into sham preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning. The primary outcome was the reduction in the incidence of CIN. The secondary outcomes were the maximum improvement in eGFR, maximum reduction in serum creatinine and composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure up to 6 weeks after PCI.

resultsEleven out of fifty patients in the study group developed CIN (22%) compared to eighteen out of the fifty control patients (36%) (p=0.123). There was a statistically significant improvement in the post procedure creatinine values at 24h (p=0.013), 48h (p=0.015), 2 weeks (p=0.003), 6 weeks (p=0.003) and post procedure glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values at 24h (p=0.026), 48h (p=0.044), 2 weeks (p=0.015) and 6 weeks (p=0.011) in study group compared to control group. The secondary outcome composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure was not statistically significant (p: 0.646).

conclusionRIPC does not result in significant reduction of CIN. However RIPC helps in the prevention of post procedural worsening in eGFR and serum creatinine even up to 6 weeks.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansIncidenceIndiaIschemic PreconditioningKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsContrast MediaContrast induced nephropathyEstimated glomerular filtration ratePercutaneous coronary interventionRemote ischemic preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID30580857
PMCPMC6306307
OpenAlexW2770002364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.