Trial reportIndian heart journal
Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy-Insights from an Indian study.
Trial report in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of Remote Ischemic Pre-Conditioning to Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Intravenous Contrast Medium Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Trial
- Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Is Renal Ischemic Preconditioning an Alternative to Ameliorate the Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Acute Kidney Injury?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2020Article
- Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients of CKD Stage III and IV Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of nephrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study if four cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could offer protection against contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and post procedural renal dysfunction in high risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
methodsThis was a prospective single blind randomized sham controlled trial where patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stage III chronic kidney disease were randomized into sham preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning. The primary outcome was the reduction in the incidence of CIN. The secondary outcomes were the maximum improvement in eGFR, maximum reduction in serum creatinine and composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure up to 6 weeks after PCI.
resultsEleven out of fifty patients in the study group developed CIN (22%) compared to eighteen out of the fifty control patients (36%) (p=0.123). There was a statistically significant improvement in the post procedure creatinine values at 24h (p=0.013), 48h (p=0.015), 2 weeks (p=0.003), 6 weeks (p=0.003) and post procedure glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values at 24h (p=0.026), 48h (p=0.044), 2 weeks (p=0.015) and 6 weeks (p=0.011) in study group compared to control group. The secondary outcome composite of requirement of hemodialysis, death and rehospitalization for heart failure was not statistically significant (p: 0.646).
conclusionRIPC does not result in significant reduction of CIN. However RIPC helps in the prevention of post procedural worsening in eGFR and serum creatinine even up to 6 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.