ArticleIndian heart journal
Evaluation of the impact of chronic kidney disease on the survival of octogenarian patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive Strategy in Octogenarians with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in-hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022Article
- A critical review of chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for coronary artery disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of chronic kidney disease on the survival of patients - 80 years of age undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the long term.
methods273 subjects who underwent PCI between January 2010 and January 2016 were divided into four categories: (1) stable angina (SA) and creatinine clearance - 30 (n=24); (2) patients with SA and CrCl <30 (n=70); (3) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and CrCl - 30 (n=51); (4) patients with ACS and ICC <30 (n=128). Mortality curves were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between groups were compared by log-rank statistic. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards method. The 4 groups were compared and the survival between the groups was evaluated.
resultsOctogenarian patients with CrCl <30 with SA and ACS have lower long-term survival (p<0.0001).
conclusionCKD has a worse long-term prognosis for patients undergoing PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.