Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30580763›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Brad Meulenkamp, Dawn Stacey, Dean Fergusson, Brian Hutton, Risa Shorr Mlis, Ian D Graham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The effects of zinc sulfate mineral supplementation on Achilles tendon healing in rats.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brad MeulenkampFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave. Suite J129, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. bmeulenkamp@toh.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-3677
Dawn StaceyFaculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Dean FergussonDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Practice-Changing Research Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Brian HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Risa Shorr MlisThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice-Changing, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchilles tendon ruptures are a common injury and are increasing in incidence. Several management strategies exist for both non-operative and operative care, with each strategy offering unique risks and benefits. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses have been performed to compare management strategies; however, all treatment options have never been integrated in a single analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a generalization of pairwise meta-analysis, which allows for the comparison of multiple interventions based on all available direct and indirect evidence. The objectives of this review are to synthesize the evidence on the management options for acute Achilles tendon rupture and identify which treatment gives the best functional outcomes.

methodsA systematic review with NMA is planned. An electronic literature search will be performed in conjunction with an experienced information specialist in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Two independent reviewers will screen citations for eligibility, extract study data, and perform risk of bias assessments. The primary outcome will be disease-specific functional outcome scores (AOFAS, Leppilahti, modified Leppilahti) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes will include complications (re-rupture, sural nerve injury, wound complications, deep infection, secondary surgeries), strength, range of motion, return to work, return to sport, and quality-of-life measures (including the SF-36 questionnaire). Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for all direct comparisons where evidence is available, and NMAs will subsequently be performed where possible to compare all management strategies. DISCUSSION: The data generated from this review will provide health-care providers with a clear evidence synthesis of all Achilles tendon rupture management strategies. Additionally, these data will be incorporated into the development of a patient decision aid to assist patients and clinicians in making a preference-based decision when faced with an Achilles tendon rupture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018093033 .

Indexed as

Achilles TendonPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicOrthopedicsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRuptureSystematic Reviews as TopicAchilles tendon ruptureNetwork meta-analysisOrthopedicsPhysiotherapySurgerySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30580763
PMCPMC6304227
OpenAlexW2906147477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.