Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30580675›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychosocial oncology

A randomized pilot trial of a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors.

Jennifer Barsky Reese, Katherine Clegg Smith, Elizabeth Handorf, Kristen Sorice, Sharon L Bober, Elissa T Bantug, Sharon Schwartz, Laura S Porter

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychosocial oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychosocial experiences of breast cancer survivors: a meta-review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Preliminary evaluation of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of an online sexual health educational video series for breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The effects of staged sexual health education on sexual and mental health in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer Barsky Reesea Cancer Prevention and Control Program , Fox Chase Cancer Center , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-2407
Katherine Clegg Smithc Department of Health, Behavior and Society; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Elizabeth Handorfe Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics , Fox Chase Cancer Center , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Kristen Soricea Cancer Prevention and Control Program , Fox Chase Cancer Center , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Sharon L Boberf Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care; Sexual Health Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Elissa T Bantugd Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center , Baltimore , Maryland , USA.
Sharon Schwartzg Department of Gynecology , Fox Chase Cancer Center , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Laura S Porterh Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-2378

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Phone-Based Intimacy Enhancement Intervention for Couples facing Breast CancerR21CA191354 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI REESE, JENNIFER BARSKY · 2015 to 2016
$345k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 4-session couple-based Intimacy Enhancement (IE) intervention addressing breast cancer survivors' sexual concerns delivered via telephone. Twenty-nine post-treatment breast cancer survivors reporting sexual concerns and their intimate partners were randomized (2:1) to the IE intervention or to an educational control condition, both of which were delivered by trained psychosocial providers. Feasibility and acceptability were measured through recruitment, retention, session completion, and post-intervention program evaluations. Couples completed validated sexual, relationship, and psychosocial outcome measures at pre- and post-intervention. Between-group effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Hedges g. Data supported intervention feasibility and acceptability. For survivors, the IE intervention had medium to large positive effects on all sexual outcomes and most psychosocial outcomes. Effects were less visible for relationship outcomes and were similar but somewhat smaller for partners. The IE intervention demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and promise in addressing breast cancer survivors' sexual concerns and enhancing their and their partners' intimate relationships and psychosocial well-being. Implications for Psychosocial Oncology Practice The IE intervention demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, suggesting it could be well-received by breast cancer survivors with sexual concerns and their partners. Effects of the IE intervention on breast cancer survivors' sexual concerns and on their and their partners' intimate relationships and psychosocial well-being could not be attributed to therapist time and attention. Interventions that psychosocial providers can use to address breast cancer survivors' sexual concerns are important to the growing number of breast cancer survivors living for many years after their diagnosis.

Indexed as

Couples TherapyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSexual BehaviorSpousesTelephoneTreatment Outcomebreast cancercouple therapyinterventionssexual dysfunctionsexuality

Identifiers

PMID30580675
PMCPMC6476670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.